Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

ubuntu.com

11–20 of 170 posts

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#11
post #8
post #4

It seems the website is in transition. While still coming soon on the homepage, the download page now lists 9.10 as newest version. http://twitpic.com/ndx0v

Front page is updated now as well.. My download via torrent is cruising right along..

http://releases.ubuntu.com/9.10/ubuntu-9.10-desktop-amd64.is...

substitute whatever particular image you need, it's all named accordingly.

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#12
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but it's coming out today, and it's going to get like a gazillion upvotes... so somebody wanted to earn the points by being the first to post. I've been using the beta for a while now, it is B.E.A.U.T.I.F.U.L. It's competing with OSX now (having surpassed Windows long long ago)

Actually, with Windows 7 and Snow Leopard out Ubuntu feels even further away from becoming mainstream. I want to like Linux on the desktop but looking at it objectively Win 7 and Snow Leopard are better.

i don't think Win7 is better. to me, it is a slight improvement over vista but still annoying and ugly. osx is the clear winner among UIs and ubuntu is nice enough for most people.

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#13
In the last version, they broke my Intel graphics driver, rendering my machine almost unusable except for the console. I spent many hours trying to fix it, and ended up switching to Arch out of frustration. I don't think I'm going back, but does anyone know if they've fixed it?

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#14
post #13

In the last version, they broke my Intel graphics driver, rendering my machine almost unusable except for the console. I spent many hours trying to fix it, and ended up switching to Arch out of frustration. I don't think I'm going back, but does anyone know if they've fixed it?

Fixed for sure. I had the same problem but instead of switching to arch I installed the latest X.org drivers.

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#15
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but it's coming out today, and it's going to get like a gazillion upvotes... so somebody wanted to earn the points by being the first to post. I've been using the beta for a while now, it is B.E.A.U.T.I.F.U.L. It's competing with OSX now (having surpassed Windows long long ago)

is it really a big jump from 9.04? the last few releases havent changed a whole lot in terms of ui polish, which I always thought was really nice until I used osx. and to be fair to the original poster, the link is available now, the site was in the middle of updating

I think it is. Pulseaudio, for example, has become sane and actually better than any other sound system I've used. It even streams to apple airports and other computers.

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#16
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Front page is updated now as well.. My download via torrent is cruising right along..

http://releases.ubuntu.com/9.10/ubuntu-9.10-desktop-amd64.is... substitute whatever particular image you need, it's all named accordingly.

It might be easier to just go to a list of all the ISOs and torrents available:

http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/CDs/karmic/

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#17
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but it's coming out today, and it's going to get like a gazillion upvotes... so somebody wanted to earn the points by being the first to post. I've been using the beta for a while now, it is B.E.A.U.T.I.F.U.L. It's competing with OSX now (having surpassed Windows long long ago)

Actually, with Windows 7 and Snow Leopard out Ubuntu feels even further away from becoming mainstream. I want to like Linux on the desktop but looking at it objectively Win 7 and Snow Leopard are better.

I spend almost all of my time in firefox, emacs and a few other programs, which are the same on every platform. It really doesn't make much of a difference to me what desktop OS I use as long as it's cheap and it works with my hardware. I use Ubuntu on an HTPC because it's free and it (usually) works. I can't imagine what MS or Apple could do to improve on free + works.

To me Linux is a lot closer now than it was in the past because you can pop a Ubuntu CD into a computer and 9 times out of time it you have a working computer with sound and everything half an hour later. 7 years ago, when I first installed linux, that would have been more like 1 time out of 10.

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#18
post #13

In the last version, they broke my Intel graphics driver, rendering my machine almost unusable except for the console. I spent many hours trying to fix it, and ended up switching to Arch out of frustration. I don't think I'm going back, but does anyone know if they've fixed it?

This was a really famous regression. It's not solely Ubuntu's fault, of course; they got bitten by shipping newer software. But yes -- they (Intel, really, not Canonical) fixed it.

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#19
post #13

In the last version, they broke my Intel graphics driver, rendering my machine almost unusable except for the console. I spent many hours trying to fix it, and ended up switching to Arch out of frustration. I don't think I'm going back, but does anyone know if they've fixed it?

They fixed that bug along w/ a few other annoying bugs (pulseaudio, laptop mic, etc). I've been running Ubuntu 9.10 for a month now on my laptop and have had almost zero problems. Only one resume fail in all that time.

Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released

#20
Just whiny, but why does Ubuntu (or most distros) not give any idea of minimum/average disk required for install in their system requirements area? I know, I can customize the install so as to reduce or increase space requirements, but even a suggestion that "a straight default install requires around 2gb of space for programs, and 1gb for swap" would be helpful.
Post reply on HN