Live data from Hacker News

Plan To Build Giant Floating Airport Off California Coast

infrastructurist.com

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: Plan To Build Giant Floating Airport Off California Coast

#11
post #6
post #4

No mention of expenses for passengers. Given transportation to/from the coast, I'd guess a plane ticket in/out of here would be prohibitively expensive in both time and money. And building a 4 story metropolis underneath doesn't make sense unless there is a reason to visit. Hotels, conference centers and shopping centers, wouldn't be enough, at least for me.

"No mention of expenses for passengers." Nor of the time factor involved. Commercial flights already take the better part of a day, even for short jumps. I can't imagine having to arrive at the ferry terminal 4-5 hours before my flight so that I can get to the terminal in time to spend 2 more hours waiting for ticketing and security and all the other delays. "And building a 4 story metropolis underneath doesn't make…

"With the massive sprawl surrounding SD I think you'd have to go a good 2 hours from the central city to find a big enough patch of land to build a new airport."

Not even close. San diego is not really that big. For example, it is a 30 min drive from downtown to alpine which is a small town in the middle of nowhere, where the more sensible plans put the new airport. That travel time can be shortened with high speed rail and it would still be many times cheaper than that ocean pipe dream.

Oh and 30 min in a car or on a train will be soo much better than 45 min on a shaking sickness inducing ferry.

Re: Plan To Build Giant Floating Airport Off California Coast

#14
post #12

Why not build the airport 40 miles inland, in the desert? There's no shortage of desert land in California. Wouldn't that make so much more sense (by orders of magnitude) than build a floating airport? Just wondering...

Nonsense! You have no sense of opera. Where would we put our SFT [1]?

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submerged_floating_tunnel . This is probably the best transportation system ever.

Re: Plan To Build Giant Floating Airport Off California Coast

#15
post #12

Why not build the airport 40 miles inland, in the desert? There's no shortage of desert land in California. Wouldn't that make so much more sense (by orders of magnitude) than build a floating airport? Just wondering...

> Why not build the airport 40 miles inland, in the desert?

Heresy! Desert land in CA is considered sacred.

Re: Plan To Build Giant Floating Airport Off California Coast

#16
post #12

Why not build the airport 40 miles inland, in the desert? There's no shortage of desert land in California. Wouldn't that make so much more sense (by orders of magnitude) than build a floating airport? Just wondering...

For one thing, a desert airport is harder to sell once you outgrow it.

"Used airport, good condition, excellent for coastal city, $15B, free shipping."

Re: Plan To Build Giant Floating Airport Off California Coast

#17
post #12

Why not build the airport 40 miles inland, in the desert? There's no shortage of desert land in California. Wouldn't that make so much more sense (by orders of magnitude) than build a floating airport? Just wondering...

Wouldn't that make so much more sense (by orders of magnitude) than build a floating airport?

Not necessarily. Look at the long-term impact of building a one-road-in and one-road-out solution into the desert vs. a potentially multi-routing solution for something on the water. It's no accident that the coastlines of the USA were populated first, and are currently the most densely populated areas of the country. Logistically-speaking, the multi-variant nature of water trails makes much more sense.

Re: Plan To Build Giant Floating Airport Off California Coast

#18
I always loved these schemes and it took me a while to understand why they are inherently expensive and so are not likely to appear soon.

The reason is that a man-made structure on the water is subject to continuous strain and thus continual and so needs continual repair. The larger the structure, the more that this becomes a problem. Bridge and ships fall apart over time and still require continuous maintenance while they're in their lifetime.

It's appealing but like the underwater city, it would be enormously impractical.

Post reply on HN