Just once it'd be nice if the author was somebody other than Brian Greene. Seems like he's the only advocate for string theory these days.
Yeah, well, string theory would get a lot more advocates if it would make a damn prediction we can actually test . I mean, if the point is to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity, shouldn't the string theorists look for any experimental domain where those two sets of physics will both operate, start predicting, and start testing? Problem is, at this point I wouldn't be surprised to hear someone say that st…
Why String Theory Still Offers Hope We Can Unify Physics
11–13 of 13 posts
Re: Why String Theory Still Offers Hope We Can Unify Physics
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't even bother reading string theory articles even physics articles for that matter. They are just filled with useless analogies that don't make anything clear. Until I get around to finishing my QFT text I just accept that I don't really care to read low information low precision pop sci.
Yeah, same here. It's unfortunate really. Which QFT text are you reading? I've just started Weinberg's book.
Re: Why String Theory Still Offers Hope We Can Unify Physics
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't even bother reading string theory articles even physics articles for that matter. They are just filled with useless analogies that don't make anything clear. Until I get around to finishing my QFT text I just accept that I don't really care to read low information low precision pop sci.
Yeah, same here. It's unfortunate really. Which QFT text are you reading? I've just started Weinberg's book.
A much more approachable first text for QFT is the book by Zee.