Submitting files with this form encoding is of course going to have the base64 overhead, but otherwise this looks great!
W3C HTML JSON form submission
11–20 of 103 posts
Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#12It amazes me that we're now at the point of standardizing sticking array references inside strings and yet we're still not having a serious discussion about what comes after HTML.
Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#13Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#14Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#15Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#16Can we just get rid of HTML and replace it with JSON while we're at it?
Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#17> wow[such][deep][3][much][power][!] And there goes my interest for this submission. Don't use overused memes in a submission. Liking the idea though.
It reminded me of that show that makes me laugh on Netflix.
It also illustrated the point that he was trying to make. I prefer warm examples, rather than ones using book titles.
Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#18They're still working on XForms after 10 years http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/
Isn't that kind of like saying "They're still working on HTML after 23 years"? Technically you're right, but version 1.1 of XForms was completed and published over 5 years ago. That said, XForms is dead AFAIK, and that's not a bad thing.
Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#19It amazes me that we're now at the point of standardizing sticking array references inside strings and yet we're still not having a serious discussion about what comes after HTML.
Re: W3C HTML JSON form submission
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's wrong with a human-readable serialization format?
Nothing - I was talking about this:
Since these same servers failed to establish a consensus (Django using "a=1&a=2" as array, whilst php uses "a[]=1&a[]=1", for example), someone has to start ...