11–20 of 27 posts
Note that Mapillary has some downsides. In addition to the CC-BY-SA license, the Mapillary T&C ( http://www.mapillary.com/terms.html 1.3) give them the specific right to reuse user content as they wish, without attribution. (This is different from OSM, which uses the ODbL.) Also, even though the license is CC-BY-SA, section 1.2 of the T&C prohibits commercial use. Further, I see no data dumps provided (or statement o…
Misleading title. openstreetmap.org doesn't have a Street View function. Mapillary has been integrated into the default _editor_ (the wonderful iD) as an aid to mapping. It's not exposed to non-editing users.
Note that Mapillary has some downsides. In addition to the CC-BY-SA license, the Mapillary T&C ( http://www.mapillary.com/terms.html 1.3) give them the specific right to reuse user content as they wish, without attribution. (This is different from OSM, which uses the ODbL.) Also, even though the license is CC-BY-SA, section 1.2 of the T&C prohibits commercial use. Further, I see no data dumps provided (or statement o…
Either it's CC-BY-SA or it isn't. Maybe someone from Mapillary could comment.
Note that Mapillary has some downsides. In addition to the CC-BY-SA license, the Mapillary T&C ( http://www.mapillary.com/terms.html 1.3) give them the specific right to reuse user content as they wish, without attribution. (This is different from OSM, which uses the ODbL.) Also, even though the license is CC-BY-SA, section 1.2 of the T&C prohibits commercial use. Further, I see no data dumps provided (or statement o…
Either it's CC-BY-SA or it isn't. Maybe someone from Mapillary could comment.
e.g. Business plans: http://www.mapillary.com/business.html "The commercial plans only regulate the use of the APIs, the photos are still under Creative Commons."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Either it's CC-BY-SA or it isn't. Maybe someone from Mapillary could comment.
Maybe the relevant section is left over from the previous license, which was CC-BY-NC ( http://blog.mapillary.com/update/2014/03/17/mapillary-goes-c... ). Alternatively, IANAL but I imagine that the individual photos could still be CC-BY-SA (if, e.g., someone else redistributes them) but that the service itself cannot be used for commercial purposes. As bulk exports are prohibited (2.1) and dumps are not provided, ho…
For those who don't know, Mapillary is attempting to be an open source, crowd sourced equivalent of Google Street View. You can download the app on your phone and do some street view today.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Either it's CC-BY-SA or it isn't. Maybe someone from Mapillary could comment.
The images are indeed CC-BY-SA. Mapillary has an API / Apps etc which could be restricted under the terms they have published. The use of the services can be seen as being different from the image data. e.g. Business plans: http://www.mapillary.com/business.html "The commercial plans only regulate the use of the APIs, the photos are still under Creative Commons."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The images are indeed CC-BY-SA. Mapillary has an API / Apps etc which could be restricted under the terms they have published. The use of the services can be seen as being different from the image data. e.g. Business plans: http://www.mapillary.com/business.html "The commercial plans only regulate the use of the APIs, the photos are still under Creative Commons."
So "you can use these images freely, but you have to first acquire them through our API, which you may not use quite freely," or am I missing something? This doesn't seem to make much sense.
Note that Mapillary has some downsides. In addition to the CC-BY-SA license, the Mapillary T&C ( http://www.mapillary.com/terms.html 1.3) give them the specific right to reuse user content as they wish, without attribution. (This is different from OSM, which uses the ODbL.) Also, even though the license is CC-BY-SA, section 1.2 of the T&C prohibits commercial use. Further, I see no data dumps provided (or statement o…
Either it's CC-BY-SA or it isn't. Maybe someone from Mapillary could comment.
Also we do give attribution to photographers under every single photo.
(I'm on the Mapillary team)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe the relevant section is left over from the previous license, which was CC-BY-NC ( http://blog.mapillary.com/update/2014/03/17/mapillary-goes-c... ). Alternatively, IANAL but I imagine that the individual photos could still be CC-BY-SA (if, e.g., someone else redistributes them) but that the service itself cannot be used for commercial purposes. As bulk exports are prohibited (2.1) and dumps are not provided, ho…
The crucial information is the lat/long of each photo. If that's not licensed openly (and, as metadata, CC0 or ODbL would be better suited than CC-BY-SA) then it's just a nice collection of photos.