Just a simple acknowledgement, your name resembles with Maximilian Kohler (from Dan Brown's novel, Angels and Demons). I was shocked for a moment! :D [Edit: fixed stupidity]
Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
11–20 of 46 posts
Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#12FYI: double checkmarks means your message was successfully delivered to their phone [0], not that they necessarily read your message. https://www.whatsapp.com/faq/en/general/20951546
WHAT?! I was using it for over 2 years under that assumption! Thanks
Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#13FYI: double checkmarks means your message was successfully delivered to their phone [0], not that they necessarily read your message. https://www.whatsapp.com/faq/en/general/20951546
AFAIK the only way to know if someone's read your message is to assume based on their last time online.
Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
WHAT?! I was using it for over 2 years under that assumption! Thanks
Funny enough, Telegram (the open replacement for WhatsApp) works in the way you had expected (double check is read confirmation).
Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny enough, Telegram (the open replacement for WhatsApp) works in the way you had expected (double check is read confirmation).
I always assumed that the first checkmark indicates "delivered" and the second one "read", since right after you post it it shows a clock-symbol. also interesting, that i assume with current network speeds sent=delivered.
Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#16Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny enough, Telegram (the open replacement for WhatsApp) works in the way you had expected (double check is read confirmation).
I always assumed that the first checkmark indicates "delivered" and the second one "read", since right after you post it it shows a clock-symbol. also interesting, that i assume with current network speeds sent=delivered.
Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#18Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#19Personally, my pain is just p2p sharing with a person sitting in front (or next to me) - I want the app to understand (say, when both users press a button - its like scanning for a nearby bluetooth connection) to add a person on my whatsapp, allow me send stuff (pics), share a contact, or share a meeting invite - stuff like that. WhatsApp would be great to do this. Proximity-based p2p connections should be quite easy, and apps could make it "feel" more automatic/magical.
Re: Show HN: Improving WhatsApp
#20Nice ideas! I wonder how the read circles scale. How do you imagine this looking for groups of 10 or 20 or more people?
I also expeimented with more checkmarks, or colored lines that come down and show read progress for individuals (like a race).
there would also be more information when you click the status bar of the chat.