Interesting that he scores "Yahoo" poorly on Googlability. I'm not sure if that's a joke, but "Yahoo" is certainly very Googlable.
“Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
11–20 of 70 posts
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#12Completely agree. There will always be good names available. Curious if PG would still rate textpayme high as I think its an awful name! Selfishly curious, how would you rate my company's name, Modea?
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#13 FragrantDuck
CourteousOwl
RecklessPig
OtherMoose
CaringFrog
MindlessFish
UpbeatLizard
WhisperedHippo
SlushyWhale
OilyAccountant
CompassionateHog
InstructiveMonkey
ForkedCow
...
Of course I did not work on this script for quite a while, and it shows. To be really trendy I'd have to remove some vowels here and there, change a 'c' for a 'k' now and add the odd '-ly'.Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#14All you need to produce a 'good' name is a simple script, a list of adjectives and a list of critters. A few sample runs from my proprietary name generator produces these CamelCased (KamlKzed?) marvels of ingenuity: FragrantDuck CourteousOwl RecklessPig OtherMoose CaringFrog MindlessFish UpbeatLizard WhisperedHippo SlushyWhale OilyAccountant CompassionateHog InstructiveMonkey ForkedCow ... Of course I did not work on…
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#15All you need to produce a 'good' name is a simple script, a list of adjectives and a list of critters. A few sample runs from my proprietary name generator produces these CamelCased (KamlKzed?) marvels of ingenuity: FragrantDuck CourteousOwl RecklessPig OtherMoose CaringFrog MindlessFish UpbeatLizard WhisperedHippo SlushyWhale OilyAccountant CompassionateHog InstructiveMonkey ForkedCow ... Of course I did not work on…
Otherwise that's the best list I've seen yet!
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#16Interesting that he scores "Yahoo" poorly on Googlability. I'm not sure if that's a joke, but "Yahoo" is certainly very Googlable.
> Yahoo is of course googlable today but from the perspective of choosing new names, anything that's a dictionary word isn't very unique
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#17The trademark application process, at its core, is simple data collection. Sadly, the TM Office website complicates this simple process with a set of baffling forms. Their design philosophy is “more but worse.” Only 40% of DIY apps are approved, so a TM lawyer is recommended. But if you're going to go DIY, just gird yourself for a miserable user experience.
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#18All you need to produce a 'good' name is a simple script, a list of adjectives and a list of critters. A few sample runs from my proprietary name generator produces these CamelCased (KamlKzed?) marvels of ingenuity: FragrantDuck CourteousOwl RecklessPig OtherMoose CaringFrog MindlessFish UpbeatLizard WhisperedHippo SlushyWhale OilyAccountant CompassionateHog InstructiveMonkey ForkedCow ... Of course I did not work on…
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#19"Nominology is my neologism for the study of naming things!" It's called onomastics, son. Now get off my lawn.
Note the update on the "nominology" article: "As soon as this went to print, Rob Felty (a linguist) informed me that the established term for what I've called nominology is onomastics. Scooped by 295 years!"
And further discussion in the comments: http://messymatters.com/nominology/