Live data from Hacker News

The laws of shitty dashboards

attackwithnumbers.com

11–20 of 126 posts

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#11
post #10
post #7

>"Corollary: No one needs real-time" If you've ever run service where you're anticipating a large traffic spike and you need to monitor server stats, real-time statistics are invaluable.

Or you release a new version of a game and you notice your arpdau tanks. ;)

Or try to instrument any analytics - and wait to verify they show up in the dashboard correctly.

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#12
post #4

Most articles are shitty, this is an example of one. Most technical articles are written by someone blinkered by their specific experience which they feel is so wonderful that they should share with the world. Save the internet from such dross and write it on a piece of paper, roll it up and shove it up the ares your talking out of.

Writing bad articles is a great way to move toward writing good articles.

Writing in the public view is a great way to get feedback on your writing and the subjects you discuss—e.g. corrections, further education, etc. For some people, it also increase the pressure to improve.

Vanity is only one possible reason for writing in the public view, and it's an exercise with large potential gains. Your perspective is entirely off, and you've decided to take an opportunity to attack someone who was either brave enough or indifferent enough to risk being attacked in the first place.

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#14
post #6
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can only agree. Especially real-time data. There are only a few cases where real-time might be usefull

If you have a site delivering real time content, such as news, its pretty important.

Not really. Humans are more or less incapable of filtering noise and avoiding making premature choices in realtime. "OMFG, this story blipped upward in a statistically insignificant way. Hype it!" Myself and a colleage ran this experiment several times at a large news organization. Realtime is useful for algorithms, useless for humans.

Of course if you are marketing an analytics product, give the customer a realtime dashboard. It's useless but it makes them feel powerful and in control. The news writers would certainly have thrown a fit if we tried to take away their useless chartbeat.

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#15
post #7

>"Corollary: No one needs real-time" If you've ever run service where you're anticipating a large traffic spike and you need to monitor server stats, real-time statistics are invaluable.

The heuristic whether to use real-time information is the following and I am paraphrasing Avinash Kaushik:

"Will a decision be made in real-time based on this information?"

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#17
post #7

>"Corollary: No one needs real-time" If you've ever run service where you're anticipating a large traffic spike and you need to monitor server stats, real-time statistics are invaluable.

If you know exactly what you are waiting for and you know exactly what you will do when it happens, then you should probably automate and optimize that process instead of spending your time building some fancy graphics. And if you don't know what you are waiting for nor what you will do about it, you don't need real time metrics.

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#18
"Take care dashboards for example. They use vast amount of real estate to display information that is useless 99% of the time. How often do you need to know the RPM on an automatic car? Can’t you just take that stupid dial out and put something useful instead?."

Assuming the author meant car, this would be very dangerous (i.e. irreversible engine damage): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redline

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#19
>They also employ UX techniques that dates from a time where the only UI component you can use was a light bulb. If that red thing is critical, can’t you tell me right away what it means?

This annoyed me a little bit. A check engine light is the perfect component for what it does. If it's on it means that something may be seriously wrong and that you're probably too stupid or ill-equipped to fix it.

If it was something simple, easily detectable and fixable it would have its own light, ie the door is open, you're running out of gas.

Re: The laws of shitty dashboards

#20
post #4

Most articles are shitty, this is an example of one. Most technical articles are written by someone blinkered by their specific experience which they feel is so wonderful that they should share with the world. Save the internet from such dross and write it on a piece of paper, roll it up and shove it up the ares your talking out of.

Such a useful, insightful comment. And how BRAVE you are to post it on an account you created just for the purpose. There does seem to be a fair amount of talking-out-the-"ares" (sic) around here, but it isn't coming from the article.

By the way, the correct word in this situation is "you're"

Post reply on HN