Live data from Hacker News

WRTnode Opened for $25

wrtnode.com

11–20 of 98 posts

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#11
post #3

I always find it hard to take things seriously when they are written in poor english. "Will coming soon" makes me worry about the quality of the rest of the project, maybe more than I should.

Next time you translate your website to Chinese let us know how it goes. Personally I appreciate that they have made the site accessible to me as an English speaker and am fine reading around any grammatical shortcomings.

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#12
post #9
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Generally in the "maker" community open hardware is based on layout and software level openeness. So board layouts are shared even if the internals are not. This is what allows adruino to be open as they share layout files and software, but the Atmel AVR micro-controller they use does not have an open design. It does get confusing since there are open hardware projects that go down to silicon, but for the most part t…

Well, my beef with it is that the proprietary blobs should be interchangeable, and that requires an open ISA, the silicone can be as proprietary as it wants, as long as the interface is open.

That would make any attempt at creating such a device very hard, if not futile, and not economical.

The ISA is just a small part of what's required. All the other interfaces are just as important such as pinouts, memory mappings, memory interface, bus support and so on.

There's very few SoCs from different vendors that are interchangeable even among the ones that uses an open ISA. This requires you to either build everyhing from scratch including the CPU, or to use more generic and perhaps interchangeable CPU or microcontrollers and rather push the special components to other chips instead of having those components on a SoC - which gains you nothing.

Meaning the value of using an open ISA is miniscule as long as the code is available and easily translated to another ISA by a compiler.

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#13
Could I have this please with 802.11ac WiFi, 5GHz, preferrably supporting a 4x4 MIMO setup. I would love to have an open access point for my network. I like to have more than 300Mbps and to avoid the 2.4GHz network though even more. I understand this owuld be more expensive, but would be willing to pay a higher price.

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#14
post #3

I always find it hard to take things seriously when they are written in poor english. "Will coming soon" makes me worry about the quality of the rest of the project, maybe more than I should.

I bet if we could read their Chinese website, the copy would be perfect.

Some manager who probably doesn't speak much English has tasked a random person on their staff who went to college in the US or UK with writing their English copy, without realizing the difference between "this person can communicate effectively 1:1 in English" and "this person can write formal English like a native speaker".

In other words, a task is being supervised by someone who doesn't understand the task. Just like every other company we deal with. As native (or at least highly fluent) speakers, we just happen to be competent to critique it.

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#15
Great effort, lovely little device. Building your own hardware is not easy to do cost effectively!

But a few niggles:

- Quoting RAM and flash in Mbits? Whilst that may be the norm for buying components, I'd argue most people familiar with OpenWrt and the Raspberry-Pi generation are going to miss this detail and think "Oh wow, 512MB RAM and 128MB flash!", when in fact it's 1/8th of that.

- There's some mention of a standard shield, but no information on what it includes or when it will be available.

- Like others have said, that scrolling on the website is extremely annoying.

Regardless, I will definitely be buying one anyway.

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#17
post #8
post #3

I always find it hard to take things seriously when they are written in poor english. "Will coming soon" makes me worry about the quality of the rest of the project, maybe more than I should.

Thanks for pointing out, we corrected it. :)

If I can share a suggestion: the phrase "Born to be proud" comes off as a bit arrogant and doesn't sound natural to a native English speaker. If you're proud of the product, or you're trying to convey the idea that it was created with good intentions, some different wording might get your point across better. Something like "a better open platform" or "born to be open" [even though that also doesn't sound natural either, unless you know what 'open hardware' is].

Here i've cleaned up some of the copy from your sales page:

"WRTnode is a high performance, low power, small, inexpensive development board intended to run OpenWRT OS. It also easily ports open source software based on Linux.

Today, more and more devices are connecting to The Internet of Things. The WRTnode is a small node which can connect to the internet all by itself and perform complex tasks, like detecting a cat running by, or identifying your speech and twittering it, or checking your email and speaking it to you, or learning how your room is laid out and finding garbage to sweep while streaming video to you over the internet. [..] Open Source hardware for OpenWrt [..] [remove the line "smart machines' heart"] complete set of high performance I/O [..] Local dns uses i.wrtno.de, wrtnode.lan, and openwrt.lan [..] default WRTnode ip 192.168.8.1 [..] WRTnode additional features (source at github.com/WRTnode):"

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#18

I hope this trend of really annoying scroll-skipping goes away like flashing "under construction" .gifs and framed pages.

Absolutely. It's all very well and clever until you can't read all the text on the final page because it flows off the bottom.

Re: WRTnode Opened for $25

#20
post #3

I always find it hard to take things seriously when they are written in poor english. "Will coming soon" makes me worry about the quality of the rest of the project, maybe more than I should.

I bet if we could read their Chinese website, the copy would be perfect. Some manager who probably doesn't speak much English has tasked a random person on their staff who went to college in the US or UK with writing their English copy, without realizing the difference between "this person can communicate effectively 1:1 in English" and "this person can write formal English like a native speaker". In other words, a t…

Yes, the Chinese website (http://cn.wrtnode.com/) is perfectly fine. (Chinese is my second language.)

However, I would not immediately characterise the copy as written by a US/UK college grad though - it feels like it is written by someone who learnt English on the mainland.

I don't really know why companies in various parts of East Asia don't hire/outsource to someone who actually is highly fluent in English to write/edit their copy. Sometimes I suspect it is simply due to cost, other times I suspect they just don't realise that their fluency is not quite.. 'international English' level

(No offence to anyone who runs/writes for East Asian company websites.)

Post reply on HN