Live data from Hacker News

First female winner for Fields maths medal

bbc.co.uk

11–20 of 26 posts

Re: First female winner for Fields maths medal

#11

[Larry Summers' head explodes.]

A female present at the top level of math achievement is not inconsistent with the 3 reasons Summers gave for the (average) lack of females there. It will still be overwhelmingly male at the top and the higher male variance in math ability is not going to magically go away.

Re: First female winner for Fields maths medal

#13
post #11

[Larry Summers' head explodes.]

A female present at the top level of math achievement is not inconsistent with the 3 reasons Summers gave for the (average) lack of females there. It will still be overwhelmingly male at the top and the higher male variance in math ability is not going to magically go away.

Might not "magically" go away but if you actually look at the data it vanishes.

Re: First female winner for Fields maths medal

#15
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A female present at the top level of math achievement is not inconsistent with the 3 reasons Summers gave for the (average) lack of females there. It will still be overwhelmingly male at the top and the higher male variance in math ability is not going to magically go away.

Might not "magically" go away but if you actually look at the data it vanishes.

Im really, honestly, interested in what data you're talking about. Please paste a link.

Re: First female winner for Fields maths medal

#17

[Larry Summers' head explodes.]

So apparently it's impossible for the academy to have this problem that we all agree tech has? Please. Summers' comments were barely a sketch of a hypothesis. He blustered until some percentage of people just assumed he had a real point. (Basically his career in a nutshell.) A critical part of his hypothesis is "there is no Pareto-efficient change to current educational practice that would reduce sex differences in variability". That claim is ridiculous on its face. Nothing to see here! Move along people!

http://media.swarthmore.edu/bulletin/?p=145 (read past the first three paragraphs; why is the sex variability inverted for Asians? perhaps Nature doesn't so completely dominate Nurture after all...)

Re: First female winner for Fields maths medal

#18
post #7

Great to see that someone who grew up in a country which many in the west believe is backward and opposed to women's education and scientific progress in general win such an award.

She isn't from Saudi Arabia. Apart from having a few nutty leaders Iran is closer to countries like Turkey than it is to Saudi Arabia.

Anyway, academia is generally one of the few "liberal" institutions in Islamic countries. The issue is usually of female graduates finding work outside academia (eg Saudi Arabia graduated its first batch of female law students in 2008 and still hasn't let them practice law).

Re: First female winner for Fields maths medal

#19
So, is there any way for someone with no theoretical math background to even grasp a poor analogy of what her work is? With prizes like chemistry and biology, I can usually sit down with Google and slowly figure out what exactly the person did. With theoretical math and physics, I can't even decipher what I'm reading.

Wikipedia: "... this led her to obtain a new proof for the celebrated conjecture of Edward Witten on the intersection numbers of tautology classes on moduli space as well as an asymptotic formula for the length of simple closed geodesics on a compact hyperbolic surface."

Re: First female winner for Fields maths medal

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Might not "magically" go away but if you actually look at the data it vanishes.

Im really, honestly, interested in what data you're talking about. Please paste a link.

The AMS commissioned a study a few years ago, and it was in the Notices in early 2011 or 2012.
Post reply on HN