Live data from Hacker News

The end of neighbours

macleans.ca

11–20 of 150 posts

Re: The end of neighbours

#11
post #9

what if you truly don't care to know your neighbors? personally, i could care less and would most rather live miles away from everyone.

I'd argue that if one _does_ have neighbors it's in your best interests to at least be on a first-name basis with them.

Re: The end of neighbours

#12
post #3

Ugh, seems like another article that derives causation from correlation. Specifically: "We have evolved for it, to the extent that those surrounded by a tight-knit group of friends who regularly gather to eat—and, crucially, gossip—live an average of 15 years longer than loners." Perhaps the reason that people with a large group of friends live much longer is that people who are in better health tend to have more act…

I assume the researchers were smart enough to think of that. Don't judge a study based on a one sentence description from a journalist.

Re: The end of neighbours

#13
post #11
post #9

what if you truly don't care to know your neighbors? personally, i could care less and would most rather live miles away from everyone.

I'd argue that if one _does_ have neighbors it's in your best interests to at least be on a first-name basis with them.

Akrasia is an unique human trait that is acting against one's better judgment.

Of course theoretically it would benefit me to know my neighbors, I don't. And I won't, I'm reluctant talking to people when it's possible to avoid.

And given that none of my neighbors ever wanted to know anything about me - it seems they don't want it too.

Re: The end of neighbours

#14
Communities, rife as they were with gossip, ostracism and superstitious cruelty, were always based on mutual need, not on acting out some supposedly gene-based pantomime. I daresay when the next drought or plague comes along I will get to know my neighbours and we'll pull together for mutual support.

Re: The end of neighbours

#15
post #6

Nieghbors have caused so many problems that people don't want them. Google "HOA hell" for more info.

What people don't want is the inconvenience of dealing with people who don't operate exactly like they do. As far as I'm concerned, this is a feature of living in community, not a bug.

I realize there are differences between living next to a drug dealer and living next to a person who likes to put 50 plastic pink flamingos in their front yard, but I suspect most of the "HOA hell" stories involve the latter circumstance rather than the former.

Re: The end of neighbours

#16
I don't think the point of the article is to go and become "pinky swear" friends of your neighbors (which seems to me that most comments here are alluding to). I just don't get the aversion of neighbors in the Western world. Sure there are annoying neighbors, but if everyone claims that their neighbor is annoying (with whatever criteria that may be) isn't there something wrong with you? Having an active social life is not the same as having meaningful relationships with people (NOT activity partners: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7632094).

Re: The end of neighbours

#17

Communities, rife as they were with gossip, ostracism and superstitious cruelty, were always based on mutual need , not on acting out some supposedly gene-based pantomime. I daresay when the next drought or plague comes along I will get to know my neighbours and we'll pull together for mutual support.

Honest question - why would you wait until the next draught or plague to get to know your neighbors well? Why not start getting to know them today, before you "need" them?

Re: The end of neighbours

#18
I believe that if we start helping each other in close proximity, we increase our self-confidence and neighborhood security all while building social capital.

I am working on an open-source hyperlocal Craigslist-style solution to the neighborhood dilemma with JoatU : http://github.com/joatuapp

Post reply on HN