Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu Mate

ubuntu-mate.org

11–20 of 96 posts

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#11

I looked at the site but I couldn't find any explanation of why this exists when there is Linux Mint Mate.[1] [1] http://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=160

At first I thought the same, but then I remembered the problems I had with Linux Mint. Most specifically, the inability to upgrade across releases.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#13
Mate is pretty cool and a lot of people I know jumped ship to it from Unity. Good luck with the project.

I personally use Xubuntu on my netbook, desktop and installed it on my parent's computers as well. Arch+Mate or back to Debian+Mate has been on my radar for a bit though.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#14
post #8
post #7

Another distro? Why maintain something like this when you can just install the same packages (including themes) on, for example, Debian?

I don't think this qualifies as a separate distro unless you also think Kubuntu and Xubuntu are separate distros. They are just Ubuntu with different packages for the UI preinstalled. You can probably install them side by side and switch to one or the other.

I think it's fair to consider them as different distros, at least in practice, given how much the choice of a desktop environment can affect the user experience. A lot of the software available by default will differ, obviously. Instructions about how to use the system differ, as well. The default capabilities and functionality will differ. The bugs affecting them will differ. All of those differences add up.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#15

Really exciting that people still yearn for classic GNOME2 desktop environments! I know quite a few people who jumped ship from Ubuntu when Unity starting being forced on everybody by default. Lubuntu (LXDE) has always been a bit buggy for me, but still makes for great systems (especially on older laptops). Though I for one think the "halcyon" days of Ubuntu didn't just include a snappy/stable user interface, it also…

LXDE has been doing some fantastic efforts in polishing with LXQt. They recently finished porting everything to Qt 5. You might want to check them out - though most distros don't have packages from git.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#16

Really exciting that people still yearn for classic GNOME2 desktop environments! I know quite a few people who jumped ship from Ubuntu when Unity starting being forced on everybody by default. Lubuntu (LXDE) has always been a bit buggy for me, but still makes for great systems (especially on older laptops). Though I for one think the "halcyon" days of Ubuntu didn't just include a snappy/stable user interface, it also…

I've just put Linux Lite (XFCE) on an old netbook, and it works great, better than Windows 7 did, with 1/3 RAM usage. Make sure you upgrade after you install or Chrome won't work. I think the upgrade even installs Chrome itself.

https://www.linuxliteos.com/

I also liked Zorin Lite, which is LXDE based, but 7.1 was very buggy for me. Maybe 8.0 will be better, and should come out this fall. But I'm happy with Linux Lite for now.

I've never liked the default Lubuntu UI and set-up. It looks too much like it was designed in the early 2000.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#17
post #14
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think this qualifies as a separate distro unless you also think Kubuntu and Xubuntu are separate distros. They are just Ubuntu with different packages for the UI preinstalled. You can probably install them side by side and switch to one or the other.

I think it's fair to consider them as different distros, at least in practice, given how much the choice of a desktop environment can affect the user experience. A lot of the software available by default will differ, obviously. Instructions about how to use the system differ, as well. The default capabilities and functionality will differ. The bugs affecting them will differ. All of those differences add up.

"Different defaults" is not really something that differenciates distros. Lubuntu, Xubuntu, Kubuntu etc have a name: They're remixes of an existing distro.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#18
Since the Ubuntu transition to Mir is imminent, will they wait until Ubuntu comes out with Mir? (probably next version). I think the performance would be even better with Mir on older hardware.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#19
Personally, I think Xubuntu desktop is better that Gnome2-based Ubuntu ever was.

It's just that the default settings – only one panel (at the top), ugly blue theme & background image – are not very appealing and feel dated.

But after adding a second panel, reorganizing panel contents, changing icons & windows themes and background image, Xubuntu desktop is very nice.

Re: Ubuntu Mate

#20

Really exciting that people still yearn for classic GNOME2 desktop environments! I know quite a few people who jumped ship from Ubuntu when Unity starting being forced on everybody by default. Lubuntu (LXDE) has always been a bit buggy for me, but still makes for great systems (especially on older laptops). Though I for one think the "halcyon" days of Ubuntu didn't just include a snappy/stable user interface, it also…

LXDE has been doing some fantastic efforts in polishing with LXQt. They recently finished porting everything to Qt 5. You might want to check them out - though most distros don't have packages from git.

Unfortunately, they haven't changed the design much.
Post reply on HN