Live data from Hacker News

Human data shows how we move in cities

cities.human.co

11–20 of 36 posts

Re: Human data shows how we move in cities

#12
This reminded me of a fragment from Cryptonomicon about collecting history of elevation of people walking around the city and trying to reconstruct a street map from it. While an interesting exercise, we just carry precise position beacons with us these days.

Re: Human data shows how we move in cities

#13
post #9

This is pretty cool, although it would be nice to see the different types of transportation across the same city. I see dramatic differences in the visualizations, sure, but they seem as dramatic as the differences in the layout and structure of these cities. While I'm giving feedback, I must say I had to pause and re-read this sentence many times: "Human helps people move almost twice as much in six weeks". As I'm n…

Thanks for the feedback. We rendered visuals for different activities in all cities. Click one of the cities on the homepage for details. We've also shared all visuals (dark and light) and some bonus gifs on Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58chppkj2ckim7s/AAAchKhSL56mjaaiA...

New York is missing a graphic

Re: Human data shows how we move in cities

#15
post #8
post #6

Perhaps the decay times on the trails is too long, but I can't really detect any patterns here, other than that people seem to walk, run, cycle and drive down roads. After a few mins, all this seems to do is highlight the road structure of a city. A shorter trail decay would highlight the people commuting and show activity for transport type by time of day. Another interesting metric would be to adjust brightness bas…

Good point. I played around with different decay times a lot, but it was very hard to settle on a decay time and opacity settings that worked for most cities, since the data set from city to city was varying in size. If I would re-render the movies, I'd definitely do try renders with lower decay times, especially for cities like NY, LA, etc.

It might be interesting to see whether or not an ideal decay time correlates with anything.

Re: Human data shows how we move in cities

#16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the feedback. We rendered visuals for different activities in all cities. Click one of the cities on the homepage for details. We've also shared all visuals (dark and light) and some bonus gifs on Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58chppkj2ckim7s/AAAchKhSL56mjaaiA...

New York is missing a graphic

Thanks! Fixed.

Re: Human data shows how we move in cities

#18
post #17

Mexico City is not showing up as a leader in walking. I find that hard to believe.

The data is coming from the subset of people who have iPhones. So you can have 30 million people walking, but if only a few are rich enough to have an iPhone, then they are invisible.

Re: Human data shows how we move in cities

#20
post #17

Mexico City is not showing up as a leader in walking. I find that hard to believe.

This is a really self-selected data set. If you look at the New York map you'd think people didn't exist in most of Brooklyn and Queens.

Ditto Vancouver where I originally come from - lots of activity downtown and in rich, young neighborhoods, but nearly zero activity in middle class or older neighborhoods.

It's not just selecting for iPhone users, it's selecting for wealthy, young, iPhone users. On a more meta level these maps are an interesting proxy for wealth, race, and age.

Post reply on HN