> Only the body of the message. Please note that, as with all OpenPGP
> messages, the email subject line and list of recipients remain
> unencrypted.
Hopefully attachments are considered part of the body?End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
11–20 of 173 posts
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#12Isn't this contrary to Google's goals as an advertising business? If people are using end-to-end encryption, they won't have cleartext emails to mine, &c. I need to wonder what the catch is, because there is definitely one: does Google own all the keys, or does Google secretly own all the keys?
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#13Isn't this contrary to Google's goals as an advertising business? If people are using end-to-end encryption, they won't have cleartext emails to mine, &c. I need to wonder what the catch is, because there is definitely one: does Google own all the keys, or does Google secretly own all the keys?
EDIT: NSA Smiley Face [http://theweek.com/article/index/252034/why-google-isnt-too-...]
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#14The FAQ states: > Only the body of the message. Please note that, as with all OpenPGP > messages, the email subject line and list of recipients remain > unencrypted. Hopefully attachments are considered part of the body?
Encrypt them before uploading them, and send the decrypting key in the body.
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#15The FAQ states: > Only the body of the message. Please note that, as with all OpenPGP > messages, the email subject line and list of recipients remain > unencrypted. Hopefully attachments are considered part of the body?
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#16The FAQ states: > Only the body of the message. Please note that, as with all OpenPGP > messages, the email subject line and list of recipients remain > unencrypted. Hopefully attachments are considered part of the body?
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#17"Please note that enabling Chrome’s "Automatically send usage statistics and crash reports to Google" means that, in the event of a crash, parts of memory containing private key material might be sent to Google." I hope that has more than a FAQ warning when they release it to the Chrome Store. Otherwise....:/ It isn't perfect but it is probably the best in-browser option given the constraints available.
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#18"Please note that enabling Chrome’s "Automatically send usage statistics and crash reports to Google" means that, in the event of a crash, parts of memory containing private key material might be sent to Google." I hope that has more than a FAQ warning when they release it to the Chrome Store. Otherwise....:/ It isn't perfect but it is probably the best in-browser option given the constraints available.
That makes it largely unusable even to test for a few users, I guess.
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#19The FAQ states: > Only the body of the message. Please note that, as with all OpenPGP > messages, the email subject line and list of recipients remain > unencrypted. Hopefully attachments are considered part of the body?
Why would attachments be considered part of the body? Encrypt them before uploading them, and send the decrypting key in the body.
Re: End-To-End – OpenPGP Chrome extension from Google
#20Isn't this contrary to Google's goals as an advertising business? If people are using end-to-end encryption, they won't have cleartext emails to mine, &c. I need to wonder what the catch is, because there is definitely one: does Google own all the keys, or does Google secretly own all the keys?
Google is not mining all networks for cleartext email. They are mining gmail which they have control of the "end". This is a huge advantage for Google as ISPs are starting to offer ability to advertise to end users by mining traffic.