For some reason this seems to be the go-to "show 'em" methodology. I think people, in general, understand what slower means. I mean this is cute but I think this might be the fourth or fifth implementation I've seen and they all have better likelihood of just annoying someone instead of educating them. I realize a standardized alert message delivered via JS doesn't have the same "share-able" impact, but it's probably…
Stop the Slow Lane
11–20 of 52 posts
Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#12I'm not 100% sure that annoying your visitors is the best way to either retain said visitors OR warm them to your cause.
Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#13Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#14Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#15It would be nice if the user were able to disable it once they got the message.
Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#16Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#17That way, they can see what the site is like and if they choose to press the button, they can see what it is like to be on the slow lane. Otherwise, the first time visitor may not give the site a chance at all.
Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#18Condescension is not exactly the best way to win people over to your cause.
Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#19For some reason this seems to be the go-to "show 'em" methodology. I think people, in general, understand what slower means. I mean this is cute but I think this might be the fourth or fifth implementation I've seen and they all have better likelihood of just annoying someone instead of educating them. I realize a standardized alert message delivered via JS doesn't have the same "share-able" impact, but it's probably…
We are considering an option that blurs out the page instead. Also - we'll add more context to the page.
Re: Stop the Slow Lane
#20Condescension is not exactly the best way to win people over to your cause.