11–15 of 15 posts
Am I the only one who sees double meaning in using a "dinosaur" to help remind people about "privacy"? Or maybe I'm just reading too far into it.
I wonder: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_(mascot) (For a minute I thought it was a Firefox dinosaur, in which case the derivation would have been far more obvious.)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_(mascot) (For a minute I thought it was a Firefox dinosaur, in which case the derivation would have been far more obvious.)
relevant> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godzilla
Facebook does not really care who you share your posts with. It does care that you stay on Facebook so that it can charge Coke and Nike and other big brands huge dollars to put their posts into your timeline. So, making you feel a little better about Facebook security could mean more money on their bottom line.
Queue the report showing that users who review their privacy/sharing settings on Facebook end up sharing more, not less...
> You might suspect this is actually a clumsy attempt on Facebook’s part to get people to change their settings from “friends” to “public.” But it isn’t, at least for now: A Facebook spokesman told me the only people seeing the pop-up box in the current test are those who are already posting publicly on Facebook. From Facebook’s perspective, then, this feature can only lead to one thing: Fewer people sharing publicly.