I feel quite old and stupid that I clicked on this expecting shave technology.
The New Razer Blade
11–20 of 72 posts
Re: The New Razer Blade
#12Razer needs to do the right thing and make Blades that are less gamer-friendly and more business-friendly. If you can tame the battery life with a more sane graphics card, you could give Apple a serious run for its money.
I would say Apple is more artist friendly than business friendly, and that's a perfect place for these high end Razor Blade machines to give them a run for.
Re: The New Razer Blade
#13Looks beautiful. How long does it run on battery? The specs are nice, but if you can't really be mobile you may as well get a desktop.
Even if you have to plug it in, a laptop is still far more portable than a desktop. If you're moving about and working in different areas, but still have access to power then a laptop could still be a better solution.
Personally MacBooks have a good battery but I'm _still_ debating buying an external battery to keep that running longer. I wonder if you could modify the HyperShop batteries to work with PC laptops...
Re: The New Razer Blade
#14I feel quite old and stupid that I clicked on this expecting shave technology.
If that's what you're looking for, though, Bevel[0] was just launched.
(I used to get terrible razor burn - switching to a double edge razor has made a huge difference. Bevel didn't invent the concept, obviously, but they do make it very convenient.).
Re: The New Razer Blade
#15But seriously, I really wouldn't mind if laptops were a centimeter or two thicker and the battery held far more than 2 hours on heavy usage. My backpack designed for laptops could easily carry two or three, so that is not a problem, and when the laptop is in use, the extra thickness doesn't really matter.
I just don't see why this craze for thinness.
Re: The New Razer Blade
#16Does nearly every laptop these days look like a Mac Book Pro? Once in a while I see things like the Yoga, but from the radius of the rounded corners, indents for opening the lid, shape/size of the keyboard keys, placement of inputs... They might as well have spray painted the MBP black and called it a night. Maybe they did...
Re: The New Razer Blade
#17Its 2014. I want 32GB of RAM as an option, and 16 GB minimum.
I am still looking for a great Linux development laptop but this is not it.
Re: The New Razer Blade
#18I feel quite old and stupid that I clicked on this expecting shave technology.
Re: The New Razer Blade
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would say Apple is more artist friendly than business friendly, and that's a perfect place for these high end Razor Blade machines to give them a run for.
I think GP was referring to how are Macs are engineer-friendly, since they run *nix and work well with Linux.
It's tolerable, but it's hardly a stellar experience. Things like suspend/hibernate, fan control, etc. are problematic, even though they're fine on most other pieces of hardware on the market.
I always sigh a bit when I hear people recommending installing Linux on a Macbook, because they're not getting the full experience - they end up thinking that Linux is buggy and doesn't support these functionalities well, when the truth is that it does, as long as you use hardware that is actually supported.
There are a number of reasons that Apple hardware will probably always be a sub-optimal platform for Linux. There was a HN comment a while back from one of the Linux kernel developers responsible for maintaining the MPB drivers who explained why this is the case, though I can't find it.
Re: The New Razer Blade
#20Most of the specs look great, but like most made-for-Windows-8 laptops on the market there is a fixed limitation of 8GB of RAM. Its 2014. I want 32GB of RAM as an option, and 16 GB minimum. I am still looking for a great Linux development laptop but this is not it.
There are absolutely use cases for more. I would love to have my home machine at my desk at work, for example, for EDA tools. But that's why you make 16GB (or even 32GB) an option.