"live by the sword, die by the sword." although they also say "don't hate the player, hate the game". So I don't know. I'd be very uncomfortable even patenting an actual mechanical device let alone an algorithm.
Anyone have experience getting software patents?
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: Anyone have experience getting software patents?
#12I am a former patent lawyer (EE), and more recently an entrepreneur who has founded and sold s/w businesses for large sums. If I were you I would forget about patenting your idea and focus on building something people want. Getting a s/w patent will take you about 4 years and probably cost you $20K-$60k to prepare, file, and argue to issuance. I'd forget about it, and focus on solving big problems that real people ha…
I also tend to think of patents as a necessary evil...a defensive measure in a world gone crazy. I've secured a few BUSINESS METHOD patents where software is a large part of the mechanism, but I've never tried to secure a patent solely based on software. TIME: The USPTO has an expedited examination service if you qualify. Otherwise, you may be looking at 4-6 years. If your claim is very complicated or is disputed it…
Re: Anyone have experience getting software patents?
#13The main thing you are paying the lawyer for is to write the patent for you. If you're willing to write it yourself, mostly, and just consult with a lawyer, it's a lot cheaper. Look into the Nolo books on the subject. You can buy them or download them free on eMule.
Nolo books are great. But your suggestion that he download copyrighted LEGAL ADVICE books from eMule? That's ALMOST funny. You should check out their Criminal Law Handbook, rms...the ebook is only $29.99 ;-)
Re: Anyone have experience getting software patents?
#14"live by the sword, die by the sword." although they also say "don't hate the player, hate the game". So I don't know. I'd be very uncomfortable even patenting an actual mechanical device let alone an algorithm.
I agree. I've benefited enormously from unpatented open-source software and methods, as has everyone reading this. However, as I said initially, there are specific compelling circumstances in this instance. Would it be non-evil if I pledged to license the patent(s) for free or for a nominal amount, say a dollar, to anyone else who offers his patent collection under the same terms or who otherwise contributes to OSS?
And whenever you talk about having patents as part of your business model, perhaps mention the ethical dilemnas involved lest you inadvertantly inspire a future Microsoft or SCO.
Re: Anyone have experience getting software patents?
#15- Really, how much should I expect this to cost? >> A few thousands. - How can I do it for less? >> Agents are a cheaper alternative to lawyers. - How long does it take until patent is awarded? >> At least 2 years, as far as I know. - Can I license the method to someone before the patent is awarded? >> Yes. - How do you choose a patent agent/attorney or do you even need to? (I know you don't HAVE to, but is it a good…
Thanks. I had looked into using an agent; a friend who has a few medical device patents suggested his agent but I've left several messages over the last week and the agent hasn't called back yet. I'm thinking I should interview two or three attorneys/agents before settling on one? What sort of rates/amount should I be prepared to pay the agent/attorney?
Re: Anyone have experience getting software patents?
#16Second, if you do it - ignore anyone that states you should do it yourself. The short of it is this - you will write a worthless patent. The claims will be malformed and even something as simple as the description can be destroyed by choosing one word over the other. With technology, I would make an attempt and then take it to a lawyer to proof to save money. The Nolo book is okay and there are others, by Aspen publishing that will help. I would expect to spend up to 20k... keeping in mind every rejection will cost you more money (you will likely get rejected at least once). Every step has fees in addition to the lawyer fee. I would highly recommend Software Patents and Drafting Patent Licensing Agreements from Aspen publishing as a start. The Nolo book is okay, but even if you ask the author (which I have) about the specifics with tech, it is only cursory. Even if you think you can pick up things such as the wording, it is highly unlikely unless you want to put in a lot of time... there is a very specific language to it.
Per licensing, I would recommend the book above. Specifically regarding your question - sure you can license your tech before it is patented (granted), but if they are infringing you cannot compel anyone to until it is granted. In other words, it is good to file the patent before you are seeking people to license your product, but you cannot have any teeth until you do.
Choosing a patent lawyer is somewhat tough. I would start looking at the patent list of firms. I do not have the link handy, but Google it. Every year there is a list of the top 100 or 500 firms listed by patents granted. *One thing to keep in mind though before you go into detail, if you have any for certain competitors, I would ask them up front if they have a conflict of interest with any of them.
One thing that REALLY concerned me is this. You stated that you implemented something a few years ago. If this is true you may no longer be able to get a patent on it... or file it. You MUST file either a patent application - provisional or otherwise - within a year of anyone knowing about it. Thus, if you created something and people knew about it more than a year (people outside of the inventors), you are not able to get patent protection. That is a hard line law. As the post above stated, filing a provisional gives you an extra year BUT you have to file something within a year of it being public otherwise it is over.
As of type, yes, always choose methods if possibe and if you have code, it is recommended to file with that. Anything that strengthens your case.
Finally, while you may think it is easy to just get a patent, it is not. The average time it takes to get through the process is years.... It takes over 2 years just to have the intial viewing of it and then it goes from there. Many average ones take 5 years to go through. In that same vein, while many like to point out how there are many silly ones, it is not entirely true in this sense. What seems obvious as an overall concept may not be when you get down to the nitty gritty with the actual method of how it is done. Further, if you do end up sneeking one through that is silly, it will be worthless and you will have done nothing but waste your time and money. Unless you are the 1 person that gets a company to back you, likely for other reasons.
I would be happy to answer anything more. Sadly, for small businesses or micro sized startups, there seems to be very little real info that leads to a lot of wasted time and money.