Live data from Hacker News

Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

spritzinc.com

11–20 of 216 posts

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#11
That's interesting. A technology like this was predicted, on theoretical grounds from reading research, in the book Reading in the Brain[1] by Stanislas Dehaene (which I highly recommend as a very good read).

For years 500 words per minute (approximately one printed page per minute) has been my baseline speed for most of the material I read in English. I read slower in my second languages, of course. Back in my college days, when I wanted to make sure I wasn't being slowed down in my studies by a too-slow reading speed, I read a lot of books from the university library about reading skill improvement, and several jointly suggested that improving vocabulary improves reading speed. I took a course about English vocabulary based on Latin and Greek word roots, and that did seem to help for years afterward in both reading speed and reading comprehension.

[1] http://readinginthebrain.pagesperso-orange.fr/intro.htm

AFTER EDIT, TO REPLY TO QUESTION:

In this context, "second languages" is a quite normal designation for language(s) acquired after one's native language(s) were acquired. My user profile lists most of mine. I read best in Chinese and in German, besides English.

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#12

That's interesting. A technology like this was predicted, on theoretical grounds from reading research, in the book Reading in the Brain [1] by Stanislas Dehaene (which I highly recommend as a very good read). For years 500 words per minute (approximately one printed page per minute) has been my baseline speed for most of the material I read in English. I read slower in my second languages, of course. Back in my coll…

How many second languages can you have?

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#13
I tried an open source version of something similar when I was still in high-school by reading Dracula. The key benefit was't the speed that I could read using the tool, it was that I found I could read much much faster when I later picked up a book.

I recently showed spreeder to my girlfriend who found the same thing.

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#15
This is called RSVP. It is easier (for the same WPM) with 2-4 words at a time than 1 word. I really hope this catches on more and allows different chunk sizes.

500 wpm with no training is an exaggeration. wpm also depends a lot on which book you're reading. however, RSVP is the fastest way to read and way over 500 wpm is possible with practice.

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#16
post #8

Looks like the same technology as spreeder ( http://www.spreeder.com/app.php )... what's the difference between the two? As someone who tried using spreeder for a while, I can say that your retention is quite a bit lower than normal reading, especially when reading complicated texts, since you loose contextual clues (your brain is really good at doing look-aheads for clues).

Spreeder shows one word at a time, right? As someone who speed-reads regularly, I find that reading three words at a time works much better than one word, especially w.r.t. retaining context. It also seems to matter whether chunks are split around punctuation or not, i.e. If the sentence is about to end after two words, the current chunk should not show the first word of the next sentence, just show the last two word…

Maybe at one point they didn't but Spreeder has had multiword support for some time.

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#17

Looks like the same technology as spreeder ( http://www.spreeder.com/app.php )... what's the difference between the two? As someone who tried using spreeder for a while, I can say that your retention is quite a bit lower than normal reading, especially when reading complicated texts, since you loose contextual clues (your brain is really good at doing look-aheads for clues).

Retention with spreeder is a matter of skill and practice. Don't give up easily. I've read difficult non-fiction in it with very good retention at 500 wpm. That requires a slower speed than I could read a simple novel (800+ wpm), but still much faster than I could read it in paper (under 300 wpm).

This took practice. I was reading economics books by Mises at 300 wpm in spreeder for a while and gradually increased the speed. I kept the speed low enough to understand it. However, it was never worse than regular reading.

Also, I started with 3 word chunks. I found that a lot easier than 1 word chunks. I normally use two word chunks now but that took work to get used to. I wanted to lower chunk size to reduce sub-vocalizing and eye movement. I've tried 1 word chunks but I lose over 100 wpm with them.

Anyway, low retention is caused by many things but is not inherent in RSVP.

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#18
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Spreeder shows one word at a time, right? As someone who speed-reads regularly, I find that reading three words at a time works much better than one word, especially w.r.t. retaining context. It also seems to matter whether chunks are split around punctuation or not, i.e. If the sentence is about to end after two words, the current chunk should not show the first word of the next sentence, just show the last two word…

Maybe at one point they didn't but Spreeder has had multiword support for some time.

Thanks, I didn't know that.

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#19
FAQ says:

> Next, let’s talk about subvocalization. This is the process whereby, whenever you read, you talk to yourself, repeating every word in your head. The issue here is that most people can only speak at about 180wpm, maximum. Increasing speed beyond that means not saying every word to yourself.

This makes no sense to me. I've read at 600 wpm while sub-vocalizing every word. That's much much faster sub-vocalizing than they claim is possible. I've experienced it.

Re: Spritz – read 500 words per minute without any training

#20
I wonder whether this uses the front-facing camera for blink detection, particularly at higher WPM settings. A blink typically lasts 100-400ms (per Wikipedia), and 500 WPM is .8333... words per 100ms. A blink thus seems very likely to miss a word or two once you're using this the way its creators intend. I don't see any mention of blinking or mitigating its impact on the site, though.
Post reply on HN