Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can tell you that all the people that have moved into my East Bay neighborhood with good schools have been from SF. People with kids that can't handle the price for private schools and deal with the kid unfriendly nature of SF.
You mean the broken needles in the gutters, the people taking dumps on the sidewalk in broad daylight, hustlers trying to sell you crack and meth on every corner downtown, and the general ambient smell of piss? Come on, nothing builds character like that.
Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#12A net loss of 1500 individuals spread out over four years: in other words, almost nothing.
I can tell you that all the people that have moved into my East Bay neighborhood with good schools have been from SF. People with kids that can't handle the price for private schools and deal with the kid unfriendly nature of SF.
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#13Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#14It's amazing how, in a city full of so many supposedly socially conscious people, the government has been able to allow things to get so bad for the middle class.
The government can accommodate (or fail to), but most of the driving factors here originate from the private sector.
The private sector hasn't done anything wrong. In fact, the people of San Francisco and their government should be grateful that, in such dismal economic times, the tech industry has chosen to locate itself in a jurisdiction so viscerally hostile to the private sector.
Without tech, San Francisco might have become a Detroit with nicer weather (a situation that the hipsters would no doubt have thoroughly enjoyed).
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#15Once again, the income range quoted in the article seems to correspond to the Thompson & Hickey 2005 definition of "Lower middle class". Mostly likely the people moving in to replace the displayed Lower-middle-classers are Upper-middle-classers making $75,000-$250,000, with only a sprinkling of Upper-classers (aka the 1%). So once again pitting the middle against itself... ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lower_middle_…
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#16Once again, the income range quoted in the article seems to correspond to the Thompson & Hickey 2005 definition of "Lower middle class". Mostly likely the people moving in to replace the displayed Lower-middle-classers are Upper-middle-classers making $75,000-$250,000, with only a sprinkling of Upper-classers (aka the 1%). So once again pitting the middle against itself... ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lower_middle_…
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#17It's amazing how, in a city full of so many supposedly socially conscious people, the government has been able to allow things to get so bad for the middle class.
The government can accommodate (or fail to), but most of the driving factors here originate from the private sector.
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#18It's amazing how, in a city full of so many supposedly socially conscious people, the government has been able to allow things to get so bad for the middle class.
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
You mean the broken needles in the gutters, the people taking dumps on the sidewalk in broad daylight, hustlers trying to sell you crack and meth on every corner downtown, and the general ambient smell of piss? Come on, nothing builds character like that.
That's a little harsh.
Re: Middle class leaving San Francisco, census says
#20It's amazing how, in a city full of so many supposedly socially conscious people, the government has been able to allow things to get so bad for the middle class.
The government can accommodate (or fail to), but most of the driving factors here originate from the private sector.
I sure as hell wouldn't want to raise a family inside SF, and the city government is the cause of the reasons why.