Author here. Let me know if you have any questions or feedback.
Does SockJSRouter do any magic to ensure that wrapped handlers won't block the Tornado event loop?
The easiest way to add WebSockets to Django
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: The easiest way to add WebSockets to Django
#121) can you describe the tornado part of the system? The blog post isn't really clear on that.
2) how do you associate websocket sessions with browser sessions?
3) how do you handle server-to-client notifications? ie. a celery task completes and you want to notify the client.
4) Is XSS a concern?
Re: The easiest way to add WebSockets to Django
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
I only looked at it for a second or so, but it looks like it's a simple json proxy. You put a webserver with persistent connections on one end (Tornado in the example code) and a regular django environment side by side. The web socket requests are translated in to GET/PUT/POST requests, are pushed to django, django responds and the response is pushed to the client. So from django's point of view there are stateless J…
I see where I was confused; I looked at the actual code itself, not the example where tornado was living and being used. What are the advantages of this over normal AJAX requests, given that it's all using the single request, single response mode of operation (and you can compress/cache AJAX requests/responses, which websockets doesn't support yet).
Re: The easiest way to add WebSockets to Django
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just this last week I started working on a new project with django-socketio, and I'm pretty happy with it so far. Why is django-websocket-request better?
I did look into django-socketio when doing research, but never actually used it. django-websocket-request is way more simple, because it does way less and doesn't cover as much as django-socketio. For example, django-socketio is bound to only using socket.io, but it also includes a whole channel subscription and broadcast system so you can send messages from the server to specific channels. django-websocket-request o…
Re: The easiest way to add WebSockets to Django
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
I did look into django-socketio when doing research, but never actually used it. django-websocket-request is way more simple, because it does way less and doesn't cover as much as django-socketio. For example, django-socketio is bound to only using socket.io, but it also includes a whole channel subscription and broadcast system so you can send messages from the server to specific channels. django-websocket-request o…
Does django-websocket-request, like django-socketio , support fallback to other transport methods if websocket isn't available in a browser?
Re: The easiest way to add WebSockets to Django
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does django-websocket-request, like django-socketio , support fallback to other transport methods if websocket isn't available in a browser?
django-websocket-request doesn't really know anything about websockets specifically. The example I provided uses sockjs which provides websocket emulation and does upgrades to other methods if supported.
Re: The easiest way to add WebSockets to Django
#17This question is more related to websockets. I have seen that they use different protocol and doesn't work behind proxies or firewalls most of the time. How do you handle this?
Using websockets relies on a proxy that doesn't pass just the headers/body, but instead sends all packets in both directions. Nginx proxies do this, Apache requires a special proxy module. Firewalls don't typically care, since it's effectively a long lived HTTP request, unless it digs into all of the packets and filters there.