11–20 of 67 posts
Questionable source imo.
Check out the video first. It is a fascinating theory Other sources: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2526467/Were-...
I'm no Egyptologist, but I think I'm right in saying that this guy is arguing against something (the whole long-ramp thing) that's been at least thought unlikely, if not wholly disproven, for some decades now.
Good theorie, but now i wonder how they got the water up. There must be evidence of pump or large amounts of buckets :D
Questionable source imo.
Or are you saying we should just dismiss all of the content because you don't like the organization that published it?
I question your belief that you can evaluate information based on the organization that provides it. Or at least that some popular or well-respected organization can be trusted to provide good information. In fact, oftentimes the most widely trusted organizations have the most invested in maintaining the status quo, which makes facts subservient to that core need to sustain the venerable order of things.
Good theorie, but now i wonder how they got the water up. There must be evidence of pump or large amounts of buckets :D
They had thousands of slaves.
I'd say whatever the most simple explanation is the answer I could see either rubble or ramps.
I am not convinced that the Egyptians could build watertight channels at this scale, especially those shown climbing up the slope of the pyramid which would have to be watertight at the top too, and under great pressure. Also one or two packages could easily get stuck in the "pipe" jamming the whole thing. Finally, the video likely downplays the number of floaters necessary to lift a block of stone.