1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1
So, yes
11–20 of 38 posts
1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1
So, yes
I'd be surprised if many people here vote is doesnt equal one. Im a poor mathematician and I agree :D
Why are you interested in getting people's opinions on a matter of fact? "Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
Some people regard it as "fact" that the Moon landings were faked. Some people regard it as "fact" that they've been abducted by aliens. Some people regard it as "fact" that they can power their car with water. Some people regard it as "fact" that there is only one size of infinity. Some people regard it as "fact" that you can choose one element from each of infinitely many non-empty sets. Some people regard it as "f…
I've meanwhile looked at some of your other recent comments, and it appears that you have rather stronger math background than I, and could well explain why your colleague's opinion is indeed not a fact. Or just refer your colleague to the excellent Wikipedia article on the subject linked to by another participant here. Is there a work issue that turns on how people at your workplace interpret 0.99999 . . . ?
it approaches 1 but is not equal to 1.
The LIMIT of .9999 is 1. Since .9 repeating is not actually the same number as .9 with an infinite number of nines at the end, you're always adding a nine out there to do something with it, right?
Sure .9 repeating infinitely is the same as one, but I'd argue that .9 with the repeating symbol is not, since the symbol indicates that the repeating has to take place manually. The repeating symbol is a mechanical one. And any manual, finite number of nines is not going to equal one, no matter how many times you manually add nines on to the end.
Plus I'm just feeling like arguing. Had a crappy day at work.
This crowd is more likely to be math folk. Both crowds just need to get out and relax more.
Why are you interested in getting people's opinions on a matter of fact? "Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
Some people regard it as "fact" that the Moon landings were faked. Some people regard it as "fact" that they've been abducted by aliens. Some people regard it as "fact" that they can power their car with water. Some people regard it as "fact" that there is only one size of infinity. Some people regard it as "fact" that you can choose one element from each of infinitely many non-empty sets. Some people regard it as "f…
FWIW it's hard to imagine the mind that wouldn't believe in the axiom of choice but would believe in .999 == 1 being a good phrase to use; that person would probably say
- 'I have a procedure for constructing a # arbitrarily close to 1, and if you tell me how close to 1 you want it i'll tell you how many steps of my procedure you need to execute'
it approaches 1 but is not equal to 1.
it doesnt approach one- your thinking of a nice graph where the line does approach but never touch, however 0.9... is NOT a function, cannot be plotted. It exists for infinite length.
Any distance it is from 1 is constant.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some people regard it as "fact" that the Moon landings were faked. Some people regard it as "fact" that they've been abducted by aliens. Some people regard it as "fact" that they can power their car with water. Some people regard it as "fact" that there is only one size of infinity. Some people regard it as "fact" that you can choose one element from each of infinitely many non-empty sets. Some people regard it as "f…
One of my colleagues at work recently told me that point nine recurring is less than one. I've meanwhile looked at some of your other recent comments, and it appears that you have rather stronger math background than I, and could well explain why your colleague's opinion is indeed not a fact. Or just refer your colleague to the excellent Wikipedia article on the subject linked to by another participant here. Is there…
There are users of our systems who have similarly strong beliefs that I simply can't fathom. I'm interested in seeing what positions people take, and how they argue them. I'm learning a lot from this forum, specifically because it is not a random sample of ordinary people.
Linguists learn the most from pathological examples of maltreatment. Likewise, I'm learning a lot by probing the corners of the beliefs of non-typical people.
And there is an issue at work that uses similar analysis as that required by this question. More detailed, more complex, less obvious, but it boils down to a similar point. As his boss I can pull rank and tell him to do it as I say, but I'd rather engender understanding.
Equivalent, but not equal.