Live data from Hacker News

"Ode To Ubuntu's Unity Dash". The Poem.

lunduke.com

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: "Ode To Ubuntu's Unity Dash". The Poem.

#11
post #3

Why is the Unity dash so slow, and why does Canonical not seem to have any interest in speeding it up? Is it faster on their testing machines? Is it significantly faster on new hardware, if you're using an SSD, or if you have more than 4GB of RAM, or something? I quite like Unity generally, but the ridiculous slowness of the dash is a constant irritant.

it's a compiz plugin written in python . python is slow.

The dash itself is written in C++. It gets some of its data from python plugins, but a) not when it's searching for local files or applications, for which it uses services compiled to native code and b) there's no reason python should be slow for stuff that isn't hugely computation intensive like, say, searching a list of filenames. Whatever Unity's problem is, the choice of implementation language is not it.

Re: "Ode To Ubuntu's Unity Dash". The Poem.

#12
post #3

Why is the Unity dash so slow, and why does Canonical not seem to have any interest in speeding it up? Is it faster on their testing machines? Is it significantly faster on new hardware, if you're using an SSD, or if you have more than 4GB of RAM, or something? I quite like Unity generally, but the ridiculous slowness of the dash is a constant irritant.

I am running 12.04 on a machine with a SSD and 16GB of RAM and it works perfectly. I was not even aware people were having this problem until I read this post.

Re: "Ode To Ubuntu's Unity Dash". The Poem.

#14
post #3

Why is the Unity dash so slow, and why does Canonical not seem to have any interest in speeding it up? Is it faster on their testing machines? Is it significantly faster on new hardware, if you're using an SSD, or if you have more than 4GB of RAM, or something? I quite like Unity generally, but the ridiculous slowness of the dash is a constant irritant.

I have no problem on my personal laptop (i7, 8GB RAM, SSD), but on my work laptop (i5,6GB, HDD) it is horrible. I can wait up to 10 seconds before it appears... I just disabled the Super key binding on that computer.

Re: "Ode To Ubuntu's Unity Dash". The Poem.

#16
post #14
post #3

Why is the Unity dash so slow, and why does Canonical not seem to have any interest in speeding it up? Is it faster on their testing machines? Is it significantly faster on new hardware, if you're using an SSD, or if you have more than 4GB of RAM, or something? I quite like Unity generally, but the ridiculous slowness of the dash is a constant irritant.

I have no problem on my personal laptop (i7, 8GB RAM, SSD), but on my work laptop (i5,6GB, HDD) it is horrible. I can wait up to 10 seconds before it appears... I just disabled the Super key binding on that computer.

HDD vs SSD would be my guess. I suspect it does a lot of disk accesses like loading icons, loading .desktop files, opening index, ...

Is it faster, when you open it the second time?

Re: "Ode To Ubuntu's Unity Dash". The Poem.

#18
post #3

Why is the Unity dash so slow, and why does Canonical not seem to have any interest in speeding it up? Is it faster on their testing machines? Is it significantly faster on new hardware, if you're using an SSD, or if you have more than 4GB of RAM, or something? I quite like Unity generally, but the ridiculous slowness of the dash is a constant irritant.

I suspect Canonical is playing the long game.

They know that the current generation of Linux desktop users may switch desktops or distros, but will just as easily switch back if Ubuntu trumps those.

For the broader audience, the Linux desktop is still not up to par with Windows or OSX, and that is Canonical's goal.

So basically, you're all just expendable guinea pigs, and all of your complaining is actually providing Canonical with cheap feedback.

Given that it's open source and we're not paying fuck all for it, I can't really say Canonical is doing it wrong.

Re: "Ode To Ubuntu's Unity Dash". The Poem.

#19
post #13
post #5

It doesn't bother me that much because it never misses what I type. I can hit the Super key, then 't', then enter, and I know that it will eventually launch a terminal.

CTRL+ALT+T might be faster in your case.

True, but you get the idea... I don't have to wait for it to "launch" before I start typing, so I don't feel like it's breaking my train of thought. This is mostly true with typing an address in Firefox too, because the history pane seems to ignore me at first which is much more annoying.
Post reply on HN