Live data from Hacker News

Understanding Banner Blindness

adpushup.com

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Understanding Banner Blindness

#11
While it's a good thing people realize that banner ads won't work as they might have some years ago, I still wonder why they discuss the "best place" of banner and how it integrates most unobtrusively. I think people will feel even more exploited when they are tricked into clicking a well hidden banner ad.

To me, the question is rather: "Is banner ads still a good form of advertising?". The only way I could answer "yes" to that is if users had a reason to click that banner, for example because they would receive something for it:

- Points for their personal sponsor

- A discount for finding that particular banner.

The reward would have to be something that makes people actively look for those banners.

In any other case, I'd argue we need a different form of online advertisement than banners.

Re: Understanding Banner Blindness

#12
post #4

I read webpages about like this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2fc9sexvijmwdgn/Banner-Blindness.g... Because content is text that is readable . It's not the color. It's not the F-shape. It's that it looks like content because I can read it with little effort. To find anything else on that page I would have to consciously look at the "menu" and "wtf" areas. Images are rarely useful, so I frequently gloss over them too, I…

"read" yes, but "use" implies you also read the menu, that area is not totally blind

Only when I want to do menu-things. The site mentions asking people to find content on the page - I would eventually check the menu-area (the correct answer is over on the right), but I would definitely tune it out until I'd exhausted the obviously-more-likely-to-be-useful areas.
Post reply on HN