Live data from Hacker News

Particle accelerators: Small really is beautiful

economist.com

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Particle accelerators: Small really is beautiful

#11
post #7

What the Economist article seem to fail to mention: "In the accelerator-on-a-chip experiments, electrons are first accelerated to near light-speed in a conventional accelerator . Then they are focused into a tiny, half-micron-high channel within a glass chip just half a millimeter long." From: Stanford's own article: http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/september/slac-chip-accel...

Take into account, though, that accelerating electrons into near light speeds is not too difficult anyway. They are thousands of times lighter than protons, for instance, which is what the LHC works with most of the time.

Actually the reverse is true. Protons emit less synchrotron radiation, making it easier to make accelerators in a ring shape. Electrons eventually radiate as much energy as it takes to accelerate them, creating a barrier.

Re: Particle accelerators: Small really is beautiful

#12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

and also: "The electrons fed into it were first sped up using a midsized standard accelerator, so when they arrived at the glass accelerator they were already travelling at 99.86% of the speed of light, or 60m electron-volts..."

And again, in the complete nonsensical quest of describing particle energies by many nines in 99.999999..% of the speed of light, the proper math falls down, 99.86% c is ~10 MeV, 60 MeV is about 99.996% c, but IT'S COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS! Nevertheless... Here's a handy online-tool to calculate the speed of a particle accellerated in a electric field (enter 60000 kV to get the values for the 60 MeV electron): http://w…

...and of course to replicate lhc they'd need to reach 3.5 TeV at high luminosity. let's just say they are not ready for this quite yet...

EDIT: (in 2011, then 4 TeV and next time they run 7 TeV)

Post reply on HN