No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
11–20 of 123 posts
Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you start rapidly losing (or gaining) weight with no obvious explanation that is a cause for concern. If you start eating much less, and exercising much more, you probably don't need to ask a doctor why you're losing weight.
I believe that the healthy rate is around 1 lbs per week with 2 lbs pushing it.
Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#13I made two small habit changes that I feel made a drastic difference:
* Bring lunch to work everyday (brown bag, leftovers)
* If I want to watch TV, I must be moving on the treadmill
I would still go out to eat at work about once every two weeks and I would sometimes sneak in an episode of Breaking Bad on the couch, but overall, I stuck to those rules and everything else seemed to fall into place.Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe that the healthy rate is around 1 lbs per week with 2 lbs pushing it.
Not when you are morbidly obese like the author was. When you are that big( pushing 300lbs) it's not uncommon to loose 5lbs a week at the start.
Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you start rapidly losing (or gaining) weight with no obvious explanation that is a cause for concern. If you start eating much less, and exercising much more, you probably don't need to ask a doctor why you're losing weight.
I believe that the healthy rate is around 1 lbs per week with 2 lbs pushing it.
That said, he (and anyone doing it) should probably check in with the doc just to make sure something internal isn't getting out of whack.
Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#16Excellent read, and keep up the good work!
Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#17Good to see!! When you are burning this level of level of energy every day, its actually to keep a stable weight. (Author must have had some base fitness, too so good for him.)
At its core, Weight change is simple input/output math. The key variable is %deplete your glycogen levels (as % of full everyday.) That is the "cache" of energy from your daily diet. If you burn enough energy to deplete this, you will lose weight, as your body replenishes itself from non-dietary reserves (fat, protein en extremis).
Surprisingsly, these are highly realistic numbers (), even for relatively fit (height/weight proportionate) people. Moderating the pace to emphasise endurance over power will lead to more loss of net-mass. Asympotically, you will reach a point of gradual returns, but it is not at all surprising to lose significant mass under such prolonged workloads.
TLDR: Glad to see this is not a crash diet.
edits: clarity
Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#18Clothing is not sized that way in the USA. 36" waist fitting into a medium?
Re: No Bread, Beer or Biscuits: How I Lost 63lbs in 100 Days
#19After attending hundreds of weight watchers meetings, and being involved with hundreds and hundreds of people losing a ton of weight, I still genuinely believe too many people make weight loss too complicated, which leads them to give up. Keep it simple (as the article did) If you burn more calories (energy) than you eat, you will lose weight . Obviously, you have choices. You can cut down on all the really high calo…