Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
11–20 of 27 posts
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#12Why the heck are we launching rockets on top of a wildlife refuge? https://www.google.com/maps/preview#!q=nasa&data=!1m4!1m3!1d...
Read the description of the photo on Instagram; they go into that.
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#13Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read the description of the photo on Instagram; they go into that.
That sounds extremely iffy to me. The "disturbance" may be short lived, and the space they take up may be a small portion of the island, but I find it hard to believe that the degree of disturbance caused by a rocket launch can be canceled out by its brevity.
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read the description of the photo on Instagram; they go into that.
That sounds extremely iffy to me. The "disturbance" may be short lived, and the space they take up may be a small portion of the island, but I find it hard to believe that the degree of disturbance caused by a rocket launch can be canceled out by its brevity.
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#16Why the heck are we launching rockets on top of a wildlife refuge? https://www.google.com/maps/preview#!q=nasa&data=!1m4!1m3!1d...
The artillery training ranges I grew up near to were similarly lush.
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#17what if one of it's ancestors once thought, i would like to fly like one of those things. a few generations of evolution later you have a flying frog. sadly that's not how evolution works.
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
That sounds extremely iffy to me. The "disturbance" may be short lived, and the space they take up may be a small portion of the island, but I find it hard to believe that the degree of disturbance caused by a rocket launch can be canceled out by its brevity.
Why not? The latest statistics I could find say that about 22 launches per year happen there. At each launch pad there are probably only a fraction of those. But even if the disturbance is approximately 2 minutes long (a slowly rising rocket), that's less than 1 hour per year. I find it hard to believe that wildlife cannot cope with that.
Wallops Island is 6 square miles.
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#19Why the heck are we launching rockets on top of a wildlife refuge? https://www.google.com/maps/preview#!q=nasa&data=!1m4!1m3!1d...
I remember reading that launch sites are often nature reserves because they're launch sites. An exclusion zone enforced by armed guards does wonders for biodiversity. The artillery training ranges I grew up near to were similarly lush.
Re: Flying frog discovered during NASA rocket launch
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read the description of the photo on Instagram; they go into that.
That sounds extremely iffy to me. The "disturbance" may be short lived, and the space they take up may be a small portion of the island, but I find it hard to believe that the degree of disturbance caused by a rocket launch can be canceled out by its brevity.
It would most likely be packed with vacation homes, just like the rest of the Mid-Atlantic shoreline.
Disclaimer: I saw this launch from Assateague and it was awesome. I was too far away to see any flying frogs, but the mosquitos and bats did not seem too upset where I was.