That Time I Made A Website
11–20 of 124 posts
Re: That Time I Made A Website
#12If this site was made by a male you wouldn't even see it on the front page of HN. (=xェx=)
Which says a lot about how sexism works both ways :)
Re: That Time I Made A Website
#13Hi everyone, sorry it went down for a few minutes. I was hosting it on Dropbox but turns out that's not a good idea for HN traffic, so I switched to using a copy of it. Thanks for reading :)
It's definitely a big step up from this - http://www.tiffany-young.com/gexpro.html :)
Re: That Time I Made A Website
#14Re: That Time I Made A Website
#15I don't understand the problem with the tag. It does the job and even though its deprecated its a long way away from being unsupported.
Since the move is to have presentation handled by CSS and HTML should only be used for semantic markup, the tag has been deprecated."
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4873491/what-is-so-bad-ab...
Re: That Time I Made A Website
#16Re: That Time I Made A Website
#17I highly recommend you check out Bootstrap[0], especially since their recently released version is mobile first. [0] http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/
Re: That Time I Made A Website
#18Re: That Time I Made A Website
#19I don't understand the problem with the tag. It does the job and even though its deprecated its a long way away from being unsupported.
"The issue is not that it is "bad". It a matter of separation of concerns. This tag is intended to be used for presentation only. It has no other semantic meaning. Since the move is to have presentation handled by CSS and HTML should only be used for semantic markup, the tag has been deprecated." http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4873491/what-is-so-bad-ab...
Re: That Time I Made A Website
#20[deleted]