The products are simple and obvious in their nature. That is why we use them.
Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
11–20 of 28 posts
Re: Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
#12Personally, I use Backpack after trying (and not liking) a whole bunch of other solutions for todo lists. I tried
- Outlook
- Pen and paper
- Simple text file
- Command line todo tool (Lifehacker)
- Remember the milk
- Google tasks
and I'm probably forgetting something, it's been a while.
I use Backpack because it's:
- Incredibly simple and intuitive to use
- Offers organization system that makes sense (pages, notes and lists - I use nothing else)
- It's easy and fast to find anything I want
- I can use it everywhere - on my phone, desktop, and the web. I use the web-based client at work and at home, also Mac desktop widget at home, and Satchel on my iPhone. The synching is seamless everywhere.
I'm not going to dignify the "RoR hype" with a response.
Re: Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
#13If you're so curious, perhaps your time would be better spent actually trying their applications, rather than "watching various videos and seeing the growth".
Re: Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
#14Less features than what? You criticize their products, yet offer no viable alternative. A better question would be "why do you use X instead of Y", where X is a particular 37 signals product, and Y is an alternative that you like better. Personally, I use Backpack after trying (and not liking) a whole bunch of other solutions for todo lists. I tried - Outlook - Pen and paper - Simple text file - Command line todo too…
Re: Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
#15If you're so curious, perhaps your time would be better spent actually trying their applications, rather than "watching various videos and seeing the growth".
I didn't read the OP's question as hostile, or suggesting their applications are rubbish. I think it's a valid question - clearly some people are willing to pay money for inferior products, because they value other things. Trust? support? name brand? Love RoR and want to support people using RoR? Analysing what those things are seems a good idea if you're trying to emulate it, and you can't do that by "Trying the app…
Re: Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
#16If you're so curious, perhaps your time would be better spent actually trying their applications, rather than "watching various videos and seeing the growth".
I didn't read the OP's question as hostile, or suggesting their applications are rubbish. I think it's a valid question - clearly some people are willing to pay money for inferior products, because they value other things. Trust? support? name brand? Love RoR and want to support people using RoR? Analysing what those things are seems a good idea if you're trying to emulate it, and you can't do that by "Trying the app…
Re: Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
#17I've been using Basecamp since 2005 - simple, responsive UI, stable. If you haven't read their manifesto on keeping things simple, you should - the 'lack' of features is intentional.
Re: Why do you use 37Signals products? Simplicity, UI, Hype?
#18If you're so curious, perhaps your time would be better spent actually trying their applications, rather than "watching various videos and seeing the growth".
I didn't read the OP's question as hostile, or suggesting their applications are rubbish. I think it's a valid question - clearly some people are willing to pay money for inferior products, because they value other things. Trust? support? name brand? Love RoR and want to support people using RoR? Analysing what those things are seems a good idea if you're trying to emulate it, and you can't do that by "Trying the app…
For example, compare Highrise with Salesforce. My company (a 50 person consulting firm) is moving away from SF to HR right now, even though SF has many, many more features. Why? Because HR has all of the features we need, and most of the features we like (but don't absolutely require). And we are much, much more productive when using HR. It's easier to use. I don't have to think much when filling in information. The reports take me about 5 seconds to read and comprehend. This time savings is very valuable to me and my company - I've got better things to do than think about how to use a CRM application. The features Salesforce possesses that HR lacks, by contrast, don't have any value.
You'll get it if you just look at things through a slightly different lens. You might be getting tripped up by the confusion of effort and size with value. Value is what software has to a customer - effort is the cost software has to developers. And size is just a number. It would be nice if these three number always correlated. But unfortunately, that isn't the case.