Live data from Hacker News

Study: Potential criminals deterred by longer sentences

journals.uchicago.edu

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Study: Potential criminals deterred by longer sentences

#11
post #3

If you want to deter crime, use brain scans to identify potential criminals and give them medication to change the way their brain works.

For deeper thoughts on the use of psychology as a means of control, see Thomas Szasz, especially The Myth of Mental Illness . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Mental_Illness While there surely exist some disorders rooted in physical defects of the brain, mental illnesses too often become a means of forcing people into conformity. Thus, the use of illicit drugs is evidence of mental illness and must be treated…

The two are not mutually exclusive. Mental illness can be used as a means to forcing people into conformity (don't kill!) while also being a direct result of a flawed brain (too violent).

Re: Study: Potential criminals deterred by longer sentences

#12

This analysis seems way too simplistic. These prisoners were given a gift of a shorter sentence. People don't like losing something they've been given and so work hard to avoid losing it. I don't think you'd see this effect if you just changed the laws and made prison sentences longer for everyone. Only these people had the potential for a longer sentence, and compared to society at large, they knew they would be tre…

>the relative size of their potential punishment is larger then the rest of the people walking around outside.

The articla does not compare the prisoners to "the rest of the people" but to other prisoners in this program. And within this group, they are "deterred by longer sentences".

Re: Study: Potential criminals deterred by longer sentences

#13

This analysis seems way too simplistic. These prisoners were given a gift of a shorter sentence. People don't like losing something they've been given and so work hard to avoid losing it. I don't think you'd see this effect if you just changed the laws and made prison sentences longer for everyone. Only these people had the potential for a longer sentence, and compared to society at large, they knew they would be tre…

>the relative size of their potential punishment is larger then the rest of the people walking around outside. The articla does not compare the prisoners to "the rest of the people" but to other prisoners in this program. And within this group, they are "deterred by longer sentences".

The ones with longer potential sentences

1) have received a larger gift, and would thus lose something larger. They may also experience a stronger desire to reciprocate this gift back to society.

2) can imagine a larger perceived injustice (compared to everyone else) if they are put in jail again. People judge things (including the size of punishment) through comparison, not absolutely. The key concept here is the punishment you would receive when "compared with others". If a person would get a larger sentence for an identical crime it offends there sense of justice and highlights the negative aspects of the punishment making it more salient in there minds.

I think my opinions above are still valid.

Post reply on HN