11–15 of 15 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You meant your interpretation not refinement?
It's not an interpretation, it's a suggestion of a more specific (which is what I meant with "refined") idea. Both the article and the linked fellowship description only mention a very broad topic. A bit like when I tell you that I'm making a salad, and you suggest that I try quinoa.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not an interpretation, it's a suggestion of a more specific (which is what I meant with "refined") idea. Both the article and the linked fellowship description only mention a very broad topic. A bit like when I tell you that I'm making a salad, and you suggest that I try quinoa.
If you were already making a salad why would I suggest you try a different salad?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you were already making a salad why would I suggest you try a different salad?
Schneier's post only mentions that he is going to work on security, power and technology as research topics. That's quite broad, so I suggested something that may be interesting within that.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Schneier's post only mentions that he is going to work on security, power and technology as research topics. That's quite broad, so I suggested something that may be interesting within that.
So you could have just responded "Yes, I am hoping he will decide to work on these three concepts that I find interesting" to my original question.