Live data from Hacker News

Life is not a conveyor belt

alexwarren.co.uk

11–20 of 40 posts

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#11
Lots of things in life seem ordinary to the point of tediousness. Marriage, the birth of a child, recognition on the job etc. These things happen to most everyone at one point or another.

I'm here to tell you that these things can be quite extraordinary when they happen to you.

Even if everyone in the line rides the same coaster, the plunge is still a thrill.

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#12
I'm not sure how applicable the key stage point is here. Children generally have little to no exposure to the fact they are part of a key stage or how that affects them until they get to the GCSE/A Level stage where clearly it's impossible to not feel the exams looming. Key stages are more a strategy thing for DfE/Local Authorities.

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#13
post #5

Every person I know, in their 20's, could have written the same post as OP... Myself included. Now they are all married with children... Myself included.

Really? As a person in my 20s, I have a reasonable number of friends who have plans of getting a house, spouse and children; many have had them since their teens.

Of course, nowadays those plans are less taken for granted, considering many can't even get jobs.

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#14
post #8
post #2

Not quite sure what the point is... wake up sheeple? You might see me with my degrees, career, dog, child, wife and house and think I'm just another conveyor-belter, but hopefully one day you will realise that every person has a unique story to tell. Even the ones who might seem boring to you. You don't have to make a grand gesture of differentness in your clothing, music taste, beliefs or lifestyle to actually be di…

Yes, if you go into detail, all people are different. But overall, most people aren't, at least not in a way that matters. But I have to admit, those who make the difference aren't those who "proclaim their differentness".

Yes, if you go into detail, all people are different. But overall, most people aren't, at least not in a way that matters.

That reminded me of this:

"I have expressed my strong interest in the mass of the people; and this is founded, not on their usefulness to the community, so much as on what they are in themselves. Indeed every man, in every condition, is great. It is only our own diseased sight which makes him little. A man is great as a man, be he where or what he may. The grandeur of his nature turns to insignificance all outward distinctions."

-- William Ellery Channing

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#15

One of the strange things about being 40 is meeting people my own age who have college-age children. It's amazing how little I have in common with people who chose that life track. They seem "old" to me, even though they're often several years younger than me. As though they've lived a lot more life than me, but not the "good" parts of life. I can't imagine how tough it must be to raise a family on an entry-level job…

But, you know, you're priviledged here because you're a guy. For a woman it's not the best idea biologically to start having kids at 40.

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#16

I think OP should take a look at Maslow's hierarchy of needs : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs

I'm aware of the hierarchy - not sure how it adds to or detracts from my post though? Do you think we inevitably progress up the pyramid as we get older - because I don't think age or progression up a career ladder is particularly correlated with fulfilment of those needs.

I don't understand how you can not see a correlation.

The jobs 'higher up' the ladder are generally better paid, with better benefits and are more enjoyable.

If you're working 10 hour shifts with two kids and a tiny flat, you don't have much time or energy left to explore self-actualisation. You are living day-to-day, in a perpetual state of tiredness, stress and worry. The only way 'out' is to get a better job. Then you will feel pride, confidence, etc etc - most of the things on the hierarchy.

I can't help but think that you have never experienced poverty. That naivety is the only way I can understand why you'd think that "progression up the career ladder" is not correlated with fulfilment of Maslow's needs (or more broadly, the basic ability to live your life the way you want. To live freely.)

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#18
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm aware of the hierarchy - not sure how it adds to or detracts from my post though? Do you think we inevitably progress up the pyramid as we get older - because I don't think age or progression up a career ladder is particularly correlated with fulfilment of those needs.

I don't understand how you can not see a correlation. The jobs 'higher up' the ladder are generally better paid, with better benefits and are more enjoyable. If you're working 10 hour shifts with two kids and a tiny flat, you don't have much time or energy left to explore self-actualisation. You are living day-to-day, in a perpetual state of tiredness, stress and worry. The only way 'out' is to get a better job. Then…

I can't spot the bit in my post where I said I knew what the answer to poverty was - but is the only option for people in poverty really to wait for a promotion?

For people who are not in poverty, which I presume includes most of us here idly browsing Hacker News, do we descend down that hierarchy of needs as soon as we step off the conveyor belt?

I think there are more paths to fulfilment than you realise.

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#19
post #15

One of the strange things about being 40 is meeting people my own age who have college-age children. It's amazing how little I have in common with people who chose that life track. They seem "old" to me, even though they're often several years younger than me. As though they've lived a lot more life than me, but not the "good" parts of life. I can't imagine how tough it must be to raise a family on an entry-level job…

But, you know, you're priviledged here because you're a guy. For a woman it's not the best idea biologically to start having kids at 40.

For a man aged 40 it is also not the best idea. The risks for children with birth defects increases substantially with older men as well.

Re: Life is not a conveyor belt

#20
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand how you can not see a correlation. The jobs 'higher up' the ladder are generally better paid, with better benefits and are more enjoyable. If you're working 10 hour shifts with two kids and a tiny flat, you don't have much time or energy left to explore self-actualisation. You are living day-to-day, in a perpetual state of tiredness, stress and worry. The only way 'out' is to get a better job. Then…

I can't spot the bit in my post where I said I knew what the answer to poverty was - but is the only option for people in poverty really to wait for a promotion? For people who are not in poverty, which I presume includes most of us here idly browsing Hacker News, do we descend down that hierarchy of needs as soon as we step off the conveyor belt? I think there are more paths to fulfilment than you realise.

You're grasping for an alternative reality where people don't need to work. But without a concrete suggestion it's just wishful thinking.

I think the fact that every large society on the planet ever has been based on this model is important.

> is the only option for people in poverty really to wait for a promotion

You're overstating my position. Don't wait for an opportunity; create one. But yes, pretty much. There is simply no responsible alternative. You can't run off into the wilderness and fend for yourself. You have to live inside the system we have created. It's really not that oppressive. You should try it.

> I think there are more paths to fulfilment than you realise.

I think the paths that you see as one are many.

edit:

> do we descend down that hierarchy of needs as soon as we step off the conveyor belt?

No, we don't. Ah I see, so what you're advocating is retirement? I think we agree!

Post reply on HN