Live data from Hacker News

What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

online.wsj.com

11–20 of 103 posts

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#11
So.. We make it so that only people likely to pay the loan back get student loans. Then, we watch as the actuaries figure out that students frompoor families are the ones who disproportionately pay their loans (since they don't have the same familial support during and after college.)

So, poor students are disproportionately denied loans, and we continue to see generational wealth inequality expand.

There are no great solutions, and there are tradeoffs everywhere. However, leaving it to the market seems immoral too.

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#12
>A 2010 study by the Goldwater Institute identified "administrative bloat" as a leading reason for higher costs. The study found that many American universities now have more salaried administrators than teaching faculty.

It's not just the number of administrators but also the pay. They tend to make many times that of actual professors. And there's no question which camp brings more value to students.

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#13
post #10

Colleges have responded to the availability of easy federal money by doing what subsidized industries generally do: Raising prices to capture the subsidy. Exactly. This is an American problem though, the Europeans figured out many years ago that making tuition free for the students is a win-win for society. Everyone wants to go to college, so just make everyone pay for it, progressively, over time.

I was under the assumption that college is free for students in many European countries, assuming the student passed certain tests. If those tests aren't passed, no college. Is that not correct?

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#14

It is criminal that serious student-loan reform isn't on the table. As a recent graduate making monthly payments towards a 5-figure principal, I say fuck capping the interest rates. Please cap tuition and fees. Don't give me that BS about how universities need the money. During undergrad, I squatted in a 600 sq. ft. apartment shared with 3 other people. I seriously doubt my health is unaffected by the mold, mildew, v…

Clearly, this is going to vary from one University to the next, but top-level administrator salaries have gone through the roof in almost every industry, including education, while most staff (and faculty, in the case of education) salaries have remained flat or even dropped.

The primary factor driving tuition rates up is reduced funding from State governments for State Universities and Colleges. Private Universities, of course, keep increasing their tuition rates to keep them at the same level relative to the State schools. Even the state schools (at least those trying to do something besides cut the quality of education and pass the costs on to the students) are getting a significant amount of their budget through private fund-raising.

Of course, when it comes to private funds, it's easy to get someone to pay for a building or renovations if you're willing to put their name on it. You may even get some scholarships for students, some equipment, extra funds for high-profile faculty (or high-profile administrators, in some cases), and many people are willing to donate their time to speak to students as guest lecturers. Good luck getting someone to pay for faculty & staff wages and benefits, though.

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#15
post #7

Good grief, I always forget how misleading the WSJ is. "Gov'ment causes those poor helpless colleges to overcharge." Bullshit. The growth in the cost of college is tied to big fat administrator salaries. It is control fraud pure and simple. To paraphrase, the best way to rob a college is to run one.

Colleges responded to the availability of easy federal money by raising prices to capture the subsidy (ie. big fat administrator salaries).

This is the only answer in this thread that is accurate.

Despite its best efforts, economic law is the only one that the government can't find a way to violate.

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#16
College is an interesting situation. It might be argued that collectively we all have an interest in seeing a more educated society, regardless of the earning power. It might also be argued that collectively we need to focus more on not "going to college" but instead focusing on things like "learning a sustainable trade".

And, for an individual looking to maximize earnings & employment, a bachelor's in STEM/business is still a really good buy, supposing you didn't go to $$$ SLAC/Ivy League. Whereas subjects that are less fiscally shiny lead their students into a dark hole of debt.

One solution is to simply collectivize the cost: everyone gets free college. That's really expensive and without good cost controls, well, is susceptible to being taken advantage of.

Another solution is to go at colleges with the dieting plan. That's the current one. IMHO, that's exactly the wrong way to go about it.

Another solution is to aggressively force state schools to cut overhead; i.e. cut the administrator staff. Well, asking people to fire themselves is sort of utopian, doncha think? :)

---

I don't really buy any of the solutions that I currently know about in the US. My thought is that there are far too many colleges in the US. Too many states trying to stretch too few dollars over too many campuses. I instead think that federal funding should go to a select few - perhaps three or four - in the US. These colleges would be fully free and fully funded by the feds. Professors would be encouraged to congregate there and focus on having huge departments where all sorts of research could go on. The overhead per college is so high; it's considerably more scalable to focus on having a few large campuses than the small ones everywhere. Each campus requires a mini admin to be set up. Worse, the larger a department is, the more interesting collisions can happen: small departments work against this by not having that interesting person to run into(they are in the other state).

Anyway, that's my undercooked idea to help college education.

Education in the US is, I think, a wreck, and it has a variety of causes. Among them, the historic anti-intellectualism of Americans, the loss of historic mission, the rank foolishness of levelling egalitarians, the shrinking dollars for defense research, etc. More causes could be added.

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#17
post #13
post #10

Colleges have responded to the availability of easy federal money by doing what subsidized industries generally do: Raising prices to capture the subsidy. Exactly. This is an American problem though, the Europeans figured out many years ago that making tuition free for the students is a win-win for society. Everyone wants to go to college, so just make everyone pay for it, progressively, over time.

I was under the assumption that college is free for students in many European countries, assuming the student passed certain tests. If those tests aren't passed, no college. Is that not correct?

Are you implying that not everyone sufficiently motivated cannot pass the necessary tests?

A question for a question ;)

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#18
I have wondered for a long time now where all the college tuition money goes.

Consider that: (1) the cost of tuition has grown FAR faster than inflation, and is now sky high, (2) A huge percentage of students need and get student loans, (3) student loans are one of the few types of liabilities that bankruptcy can't wipe out.

So "everyone" (speaking loosely) goes to college, and "everyone" gets a loan. The college gets its money up front, and bears no risk of having that money taken away. This represents a huge flow of money into universities. Where does it go from there?

How does college tuition revenue yearly compare to Apple's revenue from iphones yearly? In the case of Apple, I can see where the money goes ... Apple employs a huge number of people working on expensive ongoing operations.

What are colleges doing with all this money? Surely all of it is not being soaked up by overpaid administrators?? A money stream that large ought to have a big, obvious wake behind it, but I don't know where that money goes. Can anyone enlighten me?

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#19
For an opposite view point, see the Salon article Tuition is too damn high. It argues for the vast majority of people tuition has increased because government has drastically cut funds to public education. Not because of Pell Grants or "easy money". The author has some interesting data, as well.

Here's a glimpse:

"The first step in grappling with the rise in the cost of higher education requires understanding where students go to school. There are three main categories — public schools (which include both four-year public universities and two-year community colleges), private nonprofits (the Ivys, most liberal arts colleges, etc.), and the for-profits (Kaplan, University of Phoenix, Corinthian Colleges, aka “career schools”). Here’s the key statistic: Fully 70 percent of the 19 million undergraduates and 3 million graduate students enrolled in post-secondary education in 2010 attended schools considered to be in the public sector — by which it is meant that some portion of their funding comes directly from government."

"The problem: The word “public” doesn’t mean as much as it used to. Direct state support for public colleges has cratered over the past 10 years, and really fell off the cliff after the financial crisis. Yes, tuitions have risen, but not by as much as state and local appropriations for higher education have fallen. Just between 2008 and 2009, for example, average tuition revenue at public research institutions increased by $369 per student, but the loss in state and local appropriations per student was $751. Similarly, at public community colleges, tuition revenue rose by $113 per student, while appropriations fell by $488. Since the recession of 2001, tuition hikes, as exorbitant as they have been, still haven’t kept pace with the fall in government support."

http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/tuition_is_too_damn_high/

Re: What's Really 'Immoral' About Student Loans

#20

Good grief, I always forget how misleading the WSJ is. "Gov'ment causes those poor helpless colleges to overcharge." Bullshit. The growth in the cost of college is tied to big fat administrator salaries. It is control fraud pure and simple. To paraphrase, the best way to rob a college is to run one.

I like how you agree with the premise of the article while simultaneously calling it "bullshit". Big Brother is proud of your doublethink.
Post reply on HN