Live data from Hacker News

How to make wealth (2004)

paulgraham.com

11–20 of 27 posts

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#11
post #10
post #6

Cool essay, but : > Many employees would work harder if they could get paid for it. is just wrong. See http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pink_on_motivation.html

No its very true. Money remains a big motivation factor for those who don't have it. In general people don't get motivated by what they already have.

Motivation/Money is a logarithmic curve.

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#12
This is one of those articles I keep referring to my friends although it is almost 10 years old. It opened my eyes on how the world works, I think I learned more from it about wealth than from my entire college education (and I majored in economics).

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#13
post #11
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No its very true. Money remains a big motivation factor for those who don't have it. In general people don't get motivated by what they already have.

Motivation/Money is a logarithmic curve.

The original statement is thus valid.

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#15
> Suppose you own a beat-up old car. Instead of sitting on your butt next summer, you could spend the time restoring your car to pristine condition. In doing so you create wealth. The world is-- and you specifically are-- one pristine old car the richer. And not just in some metaphorical way. If you sell your car, you'll get more for it.

Wow. I know it sounds obvious, but for some reason this was an epiphany for me. If I just... do something, I can create value where there was none before. Suddenly it seems like there's infinite opportunities.

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#16
post #15

> Suppose you own a beat-up old car. Instead of sitting on your butt next summer, you could spend the time restoring your car to pristine condition. In doing so you create wealth. The world is-- and you specifically are-- one pristine old car the richer. And not just in some metaphorical way. If you sell your car, you'll get more for it. Wow. I know it sounds obvious, but for some reason this was an epiphany for me.…

However, there is an old saying of "you can't polish a turd", and I think that makes his example a poor one. It is notorious that you can sink a lot of money into cars that you won't ever get back out of it. That is why people that restore cars drive all around the country trying to find "solid" cars to start with. On the other hand, if you can fix it up yourself and not have to put much money into it then that does make sense.

A better example would be houses. Although even with them, if you spend money on things that you can't get money back out of (like a hot tub) when you sell it you end up in the same situation.

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A counterexample would be entertainment, e.g. minecraft.

Good point. Minecraft provides a lot of value for me and my family. It is a game we play together, even though we live towns apart. It is also a game that I'm using to teach my girls how to program (on the Rpi). Who knows what my girls will go on and build? Wealth can be created by things we misjudge.

It is also a game that I'm using to teach my girls how to program (on the Rpi).

That sounds cool, please explain more :)

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#18
post #11
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No its very true. Money remains a big motivation factor for those who don't have it. In general people don't get motivated by what they already have.

Motivation/Money is a logarithmic curve.

Until I'm far enough up that curve, this is still a strong motivation... QED

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#19
post #9

Good essay. Though I'd err new developers to not be so easily persuaded by 'the multiplier' effect. In a company your $80K job is a specialist role. One where you focus and get good at one thing. All the million other things are taken care for you, because you weren't recruited for those roles. Just your one. Working on your own product or in a startup is a comparatively generalist role. Or should I say multiple spec…

There are two things at play here. One is that not everyone is cut out to be a multi-specialist or a startup founder. Another is that there are lots of people who are, but they don't think they are capable of it. The only way you can find out if this type of startup life is for you is by trying it. The first type will try and fail, but the second type will succeed if only they try.

Actually, it's worse than that. There are so many factors beyond your control, you could try like nine or ten times before you found out whether you are cut out for it or not. Not saying people shouldn't try, just that it's not as simple as only trying.

Re: How to make wealth (2004)

#20
post #15

> Suppose you own a beat-up old car. Instead of sitting on your butt next summer, you could spend the time restoring your car to pristine condition. In doing so you create wealth. The world is-- and you specifically are-- one pristine old car the richer. And not just in some metaphorical way. If you sell your car, you'll get more for it. Wow. I know it sounds obvious, but for some reason this was an epiphany for me.…

The flip side of the coin is that, if we use that definition of wealth, then that means wealth is also subject to entropy. A car that you restore to pristine condition will rust and decay over time, even if you don't drive it. It will lose its value.

So it seems like becoming wealthy isn't just a matter of generating value, but rather generating it faster than it disappears.

Post reply on HN