Live data from Hacker News

You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

disruptivetelephony.com

11–20 of 41 posts

Re: You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

#11
post #7

Hack: You can still make outgoing calls using Google Voice/Hangouts 1. In Gmail type in your name into the "start a hangout" box 2. In Hangout window click on "add telephone". 3. type in phone number you want to call. 4. Call.

I tried it, but I didn't see "add telephone" in the hangout window. I also had to use my gmail address to start a hangout with myself.

Re: You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

#12
I don't know about others, but I don't know I like this change over previous Google Talk implementation receiving a phone call.

Being able to receive a call on Hangouts is great, but having a somewhat underpowered machine, it takes me about 10 to 15 seconds loading up full Hangouts session. (presuming, with everything including video chat components) By the time the session is loaded, the call is often already sent to voice mail, or caller would have given up on me.

I think Hangout is a great system in the situation where you are actually setting up to have one -- but not so great for responding to unexpected calls.

It wouldn't be so bad if responding to the call would actually answer a call immediately, but the way it is currently implemented, I don't think it's usable...

Re: You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

#13
post #9

So some conjecture: I can't understand why Google doesn't do SIP or even a full telecom play. The only answer I can come up with is that they don't think the business is worth the extra regulatory scrutiny. Sidenote: Dan is awesome. If you're into Telephony and you don't read his stuff you're making a mistake.

I'd suspect they don't want to get AT&T'd a lá http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_System_divestiture

How is that relevant? They don't own the entire network and it wouldn't make them a monopoly natural or otherwise.

Re: You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

#15
post #8
post #4

It's been this way with Talk and GMail for a long time. Someone calls my GV number and if GMail is open, it rings in GMail.

You are absolutely right. I've been using GV as my general number since 2009 and I do not recall this feature not being there. It is quite handy for me when I'm overseas - not paying any roaming charges to make/receive calls - but there is nothing new or disruptive in this.

If I'm not mistaken the conversion of Talk to Hangouts last week dropped this feature, and it's only now rolling back out as part of Hangouts.

Re: You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

#18
post #17
post #4

It's been this way with Talk and GMail for a long time. Someone calls my GV number and if GMail is open, it rings in GMail.

This has never been the case for me, and I leave my Gmail open always. Do you have to opt in?

Just saw this checkbox in the Voice settings. It definitely wasn't there when I first started using Voice back in the beta.

Re: You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

#19

I don't know about others, but I don't know I like this change over previous Google Talk implementation receiving a phone call. Being able to receive a call on Hangouts is great, but having a somewhat underpowered machine, it takes me about 10 to 15 seconds loading up full Hangouts session. (presuming, with everything including video chat components) By the time the session is loaded, the call is often already sent t…

I have the same problem.

Also, the call notification window disappears after about 10 seconds. I was signed into the old Google Talk too, and it range for a full 30 seconds on that one.

Re: You Can Now Call Into Google+ From Regular Phones

#20
post #9

So some conjecture: I can't understand why Google doesn't do SIP or even a full telecom play. The only answer I can come up with is that they don't think the business is worth the extra regulatory scrutiny. Sidenote: Dan is awesome. If you're into Telephony and you don't read his stuff you're making a mistake.

I think I understand why Google doesn't do it. They're relatively comfortable with the telephony status quo. Via Chrome on the desktop and Android on mobile, they've ensured that no one is in a position to "deal out" their services on any connected device, mobile or not. At this point, Google has little to gain (and much to lose) by antagonizing operators with a serious IP telephony play, especially since any mobile component would still depend on the data networks of the incumbent carriers. It's worth noting that Google is making a move in an area where they aren't as content - home internet access.

What I can't understand is why Microsoft doesn't do it. Unlike Google, they clearly aren't satisfied with the status quo and, now that they've acquired Skype, they also have a better starting position than Google does. I keep thinking Microsoft should launch a SkypePhone, but, so far, they haven't.

Post reply on HN