Live data from Hacker News

Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz

tomshardware.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz

#11
post #9
post #2

I'm a bit saddened that nearly ten years after we reached 3GHz, desktop clock speed increase has come to a halt. I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now. Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like…

> I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures Clock speeds have been irrelevant ever since there has been more than one architecture for the same instruction set. You cannot compare a 3GHz i7 with a 3GHz Pentium 4 of equal core count and say that, just because the clock is ticking at the same speed, Intel isn't doing enough to improve performance. There wo…

What can I read to learn more about the difference?

Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz

#12
post #11
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures Clock speeds have been irrelevant ever since there has been more than one architecture for the same instruction set. You cannot compare a 3GHz i7 with a 3GHz Pentium 4 of equal core count and say that, just because the clock is ticking at the same speed, Intel isn't doing enough to improve performance. There wo…

What can I read to learn more about the difference?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetBurst_(microarchitecture)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_(microarchitecture)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_(microarchitecture)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge

Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz

#13
post #10
post #8

I'm skeptical. I don't know the exact breakpoint, but pushing enough power through the small (and very dense) circuits of a processor can't go beyond a certain level based on our current CPU cooling technology. The heat at that density just becomes too high and too localized.

Liquid nitrogen or helium. But if someone went to the trouble to use these substances, they'd likely show it in action instead of some computer screen.

Late reply, I know :( - Actually, it's not even the cooling outside the CPU that's the real problem, it's moving heat away at a microscopic level near each transistor. With enough power going through enough circuits nearby, the material the CPU is made out of becomes the issue.

Consider a block of metal submerged in a (hypothetical) liquid at near 0 degrees K. Despite how much heat this liquid can draw out of the block, if heat is being generated too quickly at the very center of the block, it's possible that the heat conductivity of the metal block itself limits the efficacy of outside cooling, resulting in an "overheating" center.

Post reply on HN