Earlier quoted context omitted.
Going by historical policy, we'd have the carrier group in the waters beforehand if there was any sign of impending hostility. An attack on the carrier would probably result in retaliation against military targets. That wouldn't need to be nuclear. We still have rather a few submarines for use against capital ships, invasion ships, etc. If they can do it, we can: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uni…
Is there anything -- besides looking badass -- that carriers do that couldn't be done by a swarm of submarines or stealthed high-speed catamarans equipped with cruise missiles, SAM, and drones?
New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
11–13 of 13 posts
Re: New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there anything -- besides looking badass -- that carriers do that couldn't be done by a swarm of submarines or stealthed high-speed catamarans equipped with cruise missiles, SAM, and drones?
Support air to air combat?
Re: New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Going by historical policy, we'd have the carrier group in the waters beforehand if there was any sign of impending hostility. An attack on the carrier would probably result in retaliation against military targets. That wouldn't need to be nuclear. We still have rather a few submarines for use against capital ships, invasion ships, etc. If they can do it, we can: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uni…
Is there anything -- besides looking badass -- that carriers do that couldn't be done by a swarm of submarines or stealthed high-speed catamarans equipped with cruise missiles, SAM, and drones?
Also, spreading out thousands of crewmembers on a swarm of small surface craft would be much more of a logistics challenge for supply than a smaller number of bigger craft (as in a carrier group).