Are you serious? This isn't a joke?
I know it's hard to tell with modernists sometimes (especially when John Cage is involved!), but this one is serious.
Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
11–20 of 52 posts
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#12Here's a link to a clip of the music http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8e3qaF1ocU Doesn't do much for me, but I'm no music afficianado.
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#13I think Feldman straddles that boundary with remarkable balance. I haven't listened to his second quartet, but I've listened with intensity to his first (only an 1/½ hour work), and it's effective on both levels. It is non-traditional in its organization and its sonorities, but it has a straightforward structure that is simple enough for a lay listener to at least partly grasp in a single hearing, allowing them to appreciate it as an object of beauty. At the same time, its form and content are original enough to pique a more demanding student's interest. From the OP's description, it sounds like the second quartet is similar.
Feldman strikes me as a composer who has partly avoided and partly succumbed to the trap — all too common, as I see it — of deciding that the state of constant revolution that music has been in since about 1885 means that they can do anything they please and write music according to their own inscrutable (and often mechanical) system, shattering so many expectations so their music defies evaluation and nobody can tell them it isn't good. (The stories I could tell about some "composers" and their methods…) I blame the vast difference between the expectations of academia, which is the main supporter of contemporary composers, and those of the general audience.
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#14I never quite understood why music went this way. My take is that, as always, musicians had to have some kind of sponsorship, and it slowly shifted from musician being sponsored by noble family (for example Liszt and Esterhazy) to getting a stipend from some institutions board (for example Arnold Schoenberg who worked as a bank clerk and got his first stipend through intervention of friends). That is why nowadays you…
www.earbox.com
My favorite piece of his is Harmonielehre, but there is lots of great stuff there.
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#15Feldman's "late" works are the most remarkable. Often spanning hours in length, he transformed the concert into a ritual. "Is music an art form?" he liked to ask. In other words, is music more than just entertainment? His answer was clearly: "Yes".
Feldman's works are not just listened to, they are experienced. They are a mixture of music, performance art, and philosophy. Unlike John Cage, his close friend and mentor, Feldman was not interested in Zen philosophy. But listening to Feldman’s music leads to a heightened state of mind, a kind of musical enlightenment.
I just recorded two of Feldman's greatest works for solo piano: "Palais de Mari" (1986, 23') and "For Bunita Marcus" (1985, 67'). 15 minutes ago, I would've put the probability of seeing an article about Feldman on Hacker News at zero. Bravo.
Feldman's "Rothko Chapel" is a great way to get into his music (written following the suicide of painter Mark Rothko).
Here is part one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxSt_w2ODaQ
The story of the Rothko Chapel is well worth reading if you like abstract expressionist artwork (de Kooning, Rothko, Kline, Pollock, etc).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothko_Chapel
Also, I recommend listening to the conversations between John Cage and Morton Feldman:
http://archive.org/details/CageFeldmanConversation1
They talk, drink, smoke in the radio studio. It's all very 1960's but the insight into the lives of great composers is priceless.
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#16I never quite understood why music went this way. My take is that, as always, musicians had to have some kind of sponsorship, and it slowly shifted from musician being sponsored by noble family (for example Liszt and Esterhazy) to getting a stipend from some institutions board (for example Arnold Schoenberg who worked as a bank clerk and got his first stipend through intervention of friends). That is why nowadays you…
There is good, quality classical still being written today. Try John Adams, for example. His website is www.earbox.com My favorite piece of his is Harmonielehre, but there is lots of great stuff there.
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#17Here's a link to a clip of the music http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8e3qaF1ocU Doesn't do much for me, but I'm no music afficianado.
It doesn’t make much sense to “try Feldman” by listening to excerpts, you have to experience the whole piece if possible. The process of trying to find some meaning in the music and the eventual point of giving up and just accepting it is very interesting. At least that’s my point of view after listening to a live concert of Feldman’s For John Cage (70 minutes).
It's not easy with Feldman, but I am convinced it is possible.
Here is a 2 minute excerpt of "Palais de Mari" from 1986 (for solo piano) that may help people decide whether they want to hear more: http://ivancdg.com/music/1.mp3
People have told me that this reminds them of Debussy (the Prélude "Footprints in the Snow", specifically).
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#18There's another good essay by Alex Ross, music critic at the New Yorker:
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#19http://archive.org/details/CageFeldman3
I highly recommend listening to the entire series, of which this is part three.
Re: Almost Too Beautiful (2003)
#20Here's a link to a clip of the music http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8e3qaF1ocU Doesn't do much for me, but I'm no music afficianado.
It doesn’t make much sense to “try Feldman” by listening to excerpts, you have to experience the whole piece if possible. The process of trying to find some meaning in the music and the eventual point of giving up and just accepting it is very interesting. At least that’s my point of view after listening to a live concert of Feldman’s For John Cage (70 minutes).