Bootstrap 2.3 Released • Hacker News Board

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#11

Post by dotborg » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:15 AM UTC

Replace all CSS transitions with JavaScript transitions.

why?

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#12

Post by perry5000 » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:18 AM UTC

frisco wrote: post #10

Why the dropping of support for submenus? I find those really useful and it would be a pain to have to patch them back in.

Agreed. These are sorely needed for enterprise apps.

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#13

Post by jdorfman » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:22 AM UTC

Now up on bootstrapcdn.com

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#14

Post by weareconvo » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:27 AM UTC

dotborg wrote: post #11

Replace all CSS transitions with JavaScript transitions. why?

An inadvisable goal of supporting ludicrously obsolete browsers?

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#15

Post by robomartin » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:29 AM UTC

> Renamed all of the variables to use dashes instead of camelCase.

I absolutely detest camelCase. It ranks down there with good-old Hungarian notation.

So, I am now wondering, why this change? Are people finally coming to their senses?

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#16

Post by [deleted] » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:31 AM UTC

dotborg wrote: post #11

Replace all CSS transitions with JavaScript transitions. why?

[deleted]

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#17

Post by nicpottier » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:32 AM UTC

frisco wrote: post #10

Why the dropping of support for submenus? I find those really useful and it would be a pain to have to patch them back in.

Ya, we use them quite a bit as well, would miss them for sure.

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#18

Post by markdotto » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:35 AM UTC

dotborg wrote: post #11

Replace all CSS transitions with JavaScript transitions. why?

It's on our list to check it out because of some of lack of control CSS transitions afford us. Hacks with overflow hidden cause issues, mobile performance is rather spotty, and more. Not a guarantee, but we're considering it.

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#19

Post by blowski » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:42 AM UTC

shantanubala wrote: post #9

RaphiePS wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why does it matter?

There are some work environments where using "shit" and "fuck" would be a turn-off -- not all places are very relaxed about that stuff. On a more personal note, it feels immature -- titling a section "Oh shit what" just for the sake of irony dilutes the meaning of what they're conveying. The info would be equally effective without it, and it's just filler. I know people just want to have fun, but why not save the swe…

I agree, it's gratuitous. Anyone with a swear filter (families, corporates) can't look at the documentation, and religious organisations may feel uncomfortable.

Being open source, perhaps there's a fork opportunity for 'Bootstrap without the swearing'.

Re: Bootstrap 2.3 Released

#20

Post by gavinballard » Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 7:44 AM UTC

frisco wrote: post #10

Why the dropping of support for submenus? I find those really useful and it would be a pain to have to patch them back in.

See Mark's comments on the Bootstrap 3 pull request: https://github.com/twitter/bootstrap/pull/6342#issuecomment-...