Lolwut?
Am I about to go to jail for failing to pay my emacs fee?
11–20 of 23 posts
Lolwut?
Am I about to go to jail for failing to pay my emacs fee?
If you want to do serious commercial development, you’ll have to spend a considerable amount of money on a really good suite of tools to do so, that much hasn’t changed. Lolwut? Am I about to go to jail for failing to pay my emacs fee?
It's like it's written to not mean much, but get money from ad impressions. I didn't like the post in general, nor the title.
I don't think he makes very good points, except the variable/conditional/etc thing.
If you want to do serious commercial development, you’ll have to spend a considerable amount of money on a really good suite of tools to do so, that much hasn’t changed. Lolwut? Am I about to go to jail for failing to pay my emacs fee?
There's lots of little mistakes throughout, such as imprecise definitions for compiled/interpreted/VMs and calling DevC++ a compiler, but beginners wouldn't know the difference anyway.
The real problem is that there's just flat-out bad advice! Many of the links he posts are just the first search result you'll find on Google, yet are terrible resources. In particular, cplusplus.com, w3schools, DevC++, and cprogramming.com are things you'll hear experts warn about for being outdated, having misinformation, or just poor explanation.
If you want to do serious commercial development, you’ll have to spend a considerable amount of money on a really good suite of tools to do so, that much hasn’t changed. Lolwut? Am I about to go to jail for failing to pay my emacs fee?
This is very Microsoft-orientated. Even the open source software he recommends is Windows-only (Dev-C++, Notepad++).
If you are going to use W3Schools, you're gonna have a bad time. http://w3fools.com/
The author mentions W3Schools in a footnote and you feel you have to refer to W3Fools. Give him a break. FWIW I think the W3Schools PHP tutorial is one of the best out there. Straight to the point.
Giving students the wrong information (as w3schools frequently does) is worse than giving them no information at all. To say it's "one of the best" implies that the bar is set pretty damn low.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The author mentions W3Schools in a footnote and you feel you have to refer to W3Fools. Give him a break. FWIW I think the W3Schools PHP tutorial is one of the best out there. Straight to the point.
If it's one of the best, that doesn't say much about what's out there. Giving students the wrong information (as w3schools frequently does) is worse than giving them no information at all. To say it's "one of the best" implies that the bar is set pretty damn low.
I still believe it's a good resource which goes straight to the point. When I google something I want a straight-foward answer and not a complicated specification like the one at MDN or W3.org.
If you are going to use W3Schools, you're gonna have a bad time. http://w3fools.com/
The author mentions W3Schools in a footnote and you feel you have to refer to W3Fools. Give him a break. FWIW I think the W3Schools PHP tutorial is one of the best out there. Straight to the point.
Just go to W3fools http://w3fools.com/ and search for PHP, I'm sure you will be able to find few mistakes or bad programming practices.