I don't know if I should admire Nolan or Swartz after reading this.
Did you see The Dark Knight Rises? You should definitely admire Swartz, not Nolan.
Aaron Swartz: What Happens in The Dark Knight
11–15 of 15 posts
Re: Aaron Swartz: What Happens in The Dark Knight
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you see The Dark Knight Rises? You should definitely admire Swartz, not Nolan.
care to elaborate on that?
But increasingly, Nolan's films are trending towards the dumbed down, using shallow and boring twists in place of actually interesting writing and direction. It seems to be a profitable strategy, and I can't blame the guy for liking money, but it's also sad to watch.
Re: Aaron Swartz: What Happens in The Dark Knight
#13Re: Aaron Swartz: What Happens in The Dark Knight
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
care to elaborate on that?
It seems like Nolan used to make interesting movies that, while not always great film, at least had something unusual and interesting about them. Memento , for example, wasn't the most amazing masterpiece in the history of cinema, but it was solid, and the backwards-chronology as a narrative device was compelling. But increasingly, Nolan's films are trending towards the dumbed down, using shallow and boring twists in…
Re: Aaron Swartz: What Happens in The Dark Knight
#15> The Joker scares the city onto its two ferries. Once the ferries are in the middle of the water, he cuts their power and gives them both a button to blow up the other ferry, thereby constructing a prisoner’s dilemma (one boat is filled with real prisoners). The passengers discuss and vote. One of the prisoners makes a Ulysses pact and credibly commits by tossing the detonator overboard. This isn't actually a prison…
(Of course this isn't a practical approach, since the problem is likely to solve itself long before I'm done formalizing it.)