Earlier quoted context omitted.
It shouldn't be too difficult. Who decides what a kid should learn in the third grade? There are common standards.
It's extremely difficult, and as I said it will be easily abused by any government which is looking to manufacture consent among its population. One person's definition of harm is completely different than another person's. >The argument that words can harm has also been used to justify institutional efforts to prohibit certain language. In 2022, the Stanford University IT department launched a program entitled the “…
> by any government which is looking to manufacture consent among its population.
With all due respect, the consent has already been manufactured. We already enforce rules with far less public support.
The most simple explanation is that you and the public don't share the same political goals and you're in the minority. That doesn't mean that they're right and you're wrong. It means that the tension that you're attempting to illustrate doesn't broadly exist.