Building a native C# implementation of CEL engine

Post by rawling » Thu, Jul 30, 2026, 6:17 PM UTC

progbits wrote: post #6

akshayshah wrote: post #5

I'm surprised (without any particular positive/negative valence) that the article doesn't mention using AI to write the port - especially since both CEL and protovalidate have fairly extensive conformance testing harnesses. The project should be right in the sweet spot for today's tools. The omission is especially striking since most of the article sounds AI-authored to me. (Pangram agrees, for what that's worth.)

The code is also clearly all vibecoded. I think this is the usual we get these days: "Show HN: I built..." where in fact author did write neither the code nor the writeup.

Post by jmkni » Thu, Jul 30, 2026, 6:37 PM UTC

rawling wrote: post #11

progbits wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The code is also clearly all vibecoded. I think this is the usual we get these days: "Show HN: I built..." where in fact author did write neither the code nor the writeup.

Is the "chore" commit subject prefix an AI thing? I've started seeing that at work too...

Post by pcdevils » Thu, Jul 30, 2026, 7:22 PM UTC

rawling wrote: post #11

progbits wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The code is also clearly all vibecoded. I think this is the usual we get these days: "Show HN: I built..." where in fact author did write neither the code nor the writeup.

Is the "chore" commit subject prefix an AI thing? I've started seeing that at work too...