Live data from Hacker News

JetZero

jetzero.aero

11–20 of 277 posts

Re: JetZero

#11
post #5

Big screens are an OK workaround for no passenger windows, but they still have to contend with severe structural pressurization challenges, strict emergency evacuation rules, and incompatibility with current airport gates.

Be nice to not have to deal with that one guy who didn’t close their window when it’s dark cabin time on long multi-Timezone flights; leaving the sun to blare in when you’re really trying to get some shut eye.

Re: JetZero

#12

An airplane is not something I would personally want to beta test

The people they do that have a lot of experience and make a lot of money. Fortunately, most of the world doesn’t have the software business’ cavalier attitude about safety-related things being perfectly safe.

Re: JetZero

#13
post #2

I wish them well but a startup building an airliner seems like an utterly impossible task.

Eh, if SpaceX did rockets… I wouldn’t be surprised if they could be very nimble compared to the big ones.

The difference is that there establishment space launch companies were basically monopolies using ancient technology and processes. That’s not true for commercial aviation, which is subject to pretty relentless cost pressures.

Re: JetZero

#14
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eh, if SpaceX did rockets… I wouldn’t be surprised if they could be very nimble compared to the big ones.

The difference is that there establishment space launch companies were basically monopolies using ancient technology and processes. That’s not true for commercial aviation, which is subject to pretty relentless cost pressures.

Seems like that’s what a lot of people say about a lot of legacy businesses though when facing pressure from a startup. Obviously doesn’t always work, but sometimes!

Re: JetZero

#16
post #5

Big screens are an OK workaround for no passenger windows, but they still have to contend with severe structural pressurization challenges, strict emergency evacuation rules, and incompatibility with current airport gates.

Be nice to not have to deal with that one guy who didn’t close their window when it’s dark cabin time on long multi-Timezone flights; leaving the sun to blare in when you’re really trying to get some shut eye.

Just bring a sleep mask.

Re: JetZero

#17
post #5

Big screens are an OK workaround for no passenger windows, but they still have to contend with severe structural pressurization challenges, strict emergency evacuation rules, and incompatibility with current airport gates.

In a conventional aircraft you sit on the roll axis. In a blended wing body design you can have off-axis motion that can increase motion sickness. Rather than rolling with the longitudinal axis of the aircraft, you move up and down when the aircraft banks. Not necessarily a deal breaker, but an additional difference to deal with.

Re: JetZero

#18
post #7
post #5

Big screens are an OK workaround for no passenger windows, but they still have to contend with severe structural pressurization challenges, strict emergency evacuation rules, and incompatibility with current airport gates.

No passenger windows is the correct way to go. The screens can actually show anything, not just replace a window.

True - unlike a car, it’s not like one could open a window in a plane.

Just hope they don’t make an “ad-free” window a premium upgrade…

Re: JetZero

#19
post #2

I wish them well but a startup building an airliner seems like an utterly impossible task.

From an engineering perspective, it's a solved task. Designing an airplane is on par with designing a suspension bridge.

From a regulatory perspective, the layers of bureaucracy needed to get approval to build a bridge has nothing on starting up an airline manufacturing company. Once you have a company with a history of approval, you can practically do what you want, but getting to that point is nearly impossible.

Post reply on HN