>we are attempting to redirect some of our trade to other nations besides the U.S., including by a series of sweeping free trade agreements Canada sells $450 billion to the US annually, out of total exports of $550 billion. Let's say Carney is able to, through herculean effort, replace $100 billion of exports to the US—an immense amount, equal to Canada's entire current non-US exports—with an equal amount of trade to…
> As another Redditor put it, the first time Canadians would notice a difference in their lives is when they vote for said representatives. A country doesn't get attacked and invaded to change basically nothing or increase the life of the foreign population. It's done to exercise sustained power. Who do you think would Canadians vote for after Trump starts a war, kills hundreds or more Canadians, etc.? So, for sure t…
It's as if you blithely ignored my
>Even (again) setting aside Trump explicitly ruling out invasion
in the sentence before the one you quoted.
As for
>Who do you think would Canadians vote for after Trump starts a war, kills hundreds or more Canadians, etc.? So, for sure they wouldn't get voting rights, for example.
First, let me (again) point you to what I wrote above.
Second, let's address the question of Canadians voting after annexation in general. Americans on either side of politics think that Canada is full of super-leftists (and there is no shortage), and Canadians love repeating the "Canadian Conservatives are more leftist than American Democrats" nonsense. But were Canada a part of the US in 2016, Trump would have won AB, SK, and quite possibly enough of the GTA (the parts that loved Rob Ford, and as "Ford Country" has repeatedly won the province for Doug Ford) to win ON, the province most resembling MI/WI/PA, the three states that Trump unexpectedly won the election with. 2024? Very good chance he also takes some/all of BC, MB, NS, and NL.