Marine Le Pen's party in France leans socialist on econ but is painted as 'far right' for the same reason.
Donation Controversy
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: Donation Controversy
#12> We have nurtured a culture of radical tolerance. Play radical games, win radical prizes. The last place I want my money going is towards radical authoritarianism, a cause that I thought Mullvad would thoroughly oppose. > Self-censorship out of fear is an even bigger dampener than direct censorship. Bullshit. Self-censorship is a self-preservation mechanism, a VPN doesn't change the consequences of saying illegal or…
[insert Paradox of Tolerance quote here]
Re: Donation Controversy
#13Who is the most trusted VPN provider now?
https://www.privacyguides.org/en/vpn/
Obscura by definition is the same or better than Mullvad because of the multi-party relay. Similar with iCloud Private Relay but that's only for Safari which is inadequate.
Nym looks promising but mixnets haven't been tested as much as the Tor network.
Re: Donation Controversy
#14Only in Europe could a party with socialist-leaning values on every single issue except immigration be branded 'far right'. This is the case in every single European country for some reason. Marine Le Pen's party in France leans socialist on econ but is painted as 'far right' for the same reason.
Re: Donation Controversy
#15Personally, I'd rather not have a company I work for police my social media and political activities just so that they fit with what the company desires. That would make me quit as I value a separation between my personal and work activities. That said, the fact that the person involved is the founder of this company (not a regular employee) does change things though. I don't know anything about the politics involved…
I want them to be strongly biased in favor of free expression.
But they take my money and use it restrict how people dress, how they pray, what customs they are allowed to follow, what they teach their kids.
The agenda they support is anti-free-expression, and that's worse than neutral.
Re: Donation Controversy
#16Re: Donation Controversy
#17> We have nurtured a culture of radical tolerance. Play radical games, win radical prizes. The last place I want my money going is towards radical authoritarianism, a cause that I thought Mullvad would thoroughly oppose. > Self-censorship out of fear is an even bigger dampener than direct censorship. Bullshit. Self-censorship is a self-preservation mechanism, a VPN doesn't change the consequences of saying illegal or…
The "radical tolerance" thing is also a little ironic, since the biggest controversy with the party that the founder donated to is that the party isn't tolerant of people from different backgrounds or nationalities... [insert Paradox of Tolerance quote here]
And the most extreme position they have stated is that "it doesn't matter if you're born here, if you commit crimes and don't respect the culture you should probably leave".
That is an extreme position, but it's not as black as people seem to paint it, which implies heavily that the party is just simply racist against non-swedes.
The actual racist party is the second most voted for party in Sweden, I think because of how intolerant the society has been about talking about the issues caused by migration. That is my own opinion though, as a migrant, living in the city with the most migrants in Sweden.
Re: Donation Controversy
#18> We have nurtured a culture of radical tolerance. Play radical games, win radical prizes. The last place I want my money going is towards radical authoritarianism, a cause that I thought Mullvad would thoroughly oppose. > Self-censorship out of fear is an even bigger dampener than direct censorship. Bullshit. Self-censorship is a self-preservation mechanism, a VPN doesn't change the consequences of saying illegal or…
The "radical tolerance" thing is also a little ironic, since the biggest controversy with the party that the founder donated to is that the party isn't tolerant of people from different backgrounds or nationalities... [insert Paradox of Tolerance quote here]
'In 2026 Örebro Party leader Markus Allard sparked controversy on several occasions. In a debate hosted by Studio3 with Liberal member of parliament Martin Melin, Allard asked: "why won't the Liberals push for deporting 100 000 social welfare-Somalis?" and in the same debate said that "Sweden belongs to the Swedes. We have to make sure that we take care of our own damn people and we must deport these damn parasites who sit and live at our expense."
In a podcast segment about immigration and deportations Allard stated his opinion and said that "They will also be forced to leave, even if they are born in Sweden, because they have no natural connection to Sweden. They are not Swedish."'
Re: Donation Controversy
#19[flagged]
Re: Donation Controversy
#20> We have nurtured a culture of radical tolerance. Play radical games, win radical prizes. The last place I want my money going is towards radical authoritarianism, a cause that I thought Mullvad would thoroughly oppose. > Self-censorship out of fear is an even bigger dampener than direct censorship. Bullshit. Self-censorship is a self-preservation mechanism, a VPN doesn't change the consequences of saying illegal or…