11–20 of 42 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I feel like that should be considered acceptable Not if they're married and their spouse also drives the vehicle.
Ethics aside, I don’t think there’s a legal issue with obtaining data on one’s spouse.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I feel like that should be considered acceptable Not if they're married and their spouse also drives the vehicle.
Ethics aside, I don’t think there’s a legal issue with obtaining data on one’s spouse.
I'm not sure what to think here. Legitimate misuse, sure. But the article says at least one person only looked up their own license plate. I feel like that should be considered acceptable. It's not law enforcement usage specifically, but can't I grant myself the right to see information on my own vehicle? Yes, devil's advocate could say if standard citizens can't, no one can. Just seems so minor it's not worth losing…
If a cop was checking to make sure they got away with drunk driving, it removes factors that might deter them from continuing that behavior.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I feel like that should be considered acceptable Not if they're married and their spouse also drives the vehicle.
Ethics aside, I don’t think there’s a legal issue with obtaining data on one’s spouse.
"Ethics aside" for the person empowered to act on behalf of the state?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I feel like that should be considered acceptable Not if they're married and their spouse also drives the vehicle.
Ethics aside, I don’t think there’s a legal issue with obtaining data on one’s spouse.
Oh right, because I am worried about the safety of my children. God save us from child safety.
In a way, new companies like Flock entering such domains are a boon because they probably maintain tight audit logs and alerting mechanisms. Traditional look-up software is probably being misused by cops all the time (à la the old noir trope of a PI having "a buddy in the department" who can look up anything for him).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ethics aside, I don’t think there’s a legal issue with obtaining data on one’s spouse.
That’s a take. Maybe stop, say it out loud and see if you catch yourself. Like, why am I searching for where my own car has been? Oh right, because I am worried about the safety of my children. God save us from child safety.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I feel like that should be considered acceptable Not if they're married and their spouse also drives the vehicle.
Ethics aside, I don’t think there’s a legal issue with obtaining data on one’s spouse.
Unless you mean that there's no legal issue with obtaining data in anyone, which is a much larger problem.