How to Abandon Your Climate Commitments and Get Away with It

Post by xyzsparetimexyz » Sun, Jul 19, 2026, 11:58 PM UTC

mmooss wrote: post #4

madhacker wrote: post #2

Needs a Hail Mary event for humanity to work together

The event we need is for you and others to start working, instead of standing on the sidelines telling other people it's impossible. Humanity has overcome many things by working together. Much of humanity is already working together to overcome climate change. In fact, if the Republican Party in the US would get to work on it, that may be a sufficient fraction of humanity. And if the US led on it, more would particip…

Post by timr » Mon, Jul 20, 2026, 12:05 AM UTC

rho138 wrote: post #6

Nah guys, it’s cool, by 2050 the earths atmosphere acidifies for humans and our bodies can’t hold enough phosphorus or calcium for basic metabolic tasks: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-026-01918-5

Post by tremon » Mon, Jul 20, 2026, 12:19 AM UTC

timr wrote: post #13

rho138 wrote: post #6

Nah guys, it’s cool, by 2050 the earths atmosphere acidifies for humans and our bodies can’t hold enough phosphorus or calcium for basic metabolic tasks: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-026-01918-5

This article is nonsense. It takes observational data from a survey, averages it, doesn’t control for obvious medical factors that more strongly influence the observed data than climate (e.g. illnesses), and then asserts that the correlation is causative. It is not science. It’s just propaganda.

Post by slopinthebag » Mon, Jul 20, 2026, 12:32 AM UTC

tremon wrote: post #15

timr wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This article is nonsense. It takes observational data from a survey, averages it, doesn’t control for obvious medical factors that more strongly influence the observed data than climate (e.g. illnesses), and then asserts that the correlation is causative. It is not science. It’s just propaganda.

I look forward to reading your research article refuting this one. Please let us know the arxiv url when you're ready to publish.

Post by 8note » Mon, Jul 20, 2026, 12:35 AM UTC

tremon wrote: post #15

timr wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This article is nonsense. It takes observational data from a survey, averages it, doesn’t control for obvious medical factors that more strongly influence the observed data than climate (e.g. illnesses), and then asserts that the correlation is causative. It is not science. It’s just propaganda.

I look forward to reading your research article refuting this one. Please let us know the arxiv url when you're ready to publish.