Live data from Hacker News

Israeli ministers announce plans for illegal settlements in Gaza and West Bank

theguardian.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Israeli ministers announce plans for illegal settlements in Gaza and West Bank

#11
From The Guardian:

> About 2 million Palestinians who survived Israel’s war of annihilation…

There were about 2 million people in Gaza before the war. So if the aim of this war was “annihilation”, is Israel just really bad at killing people?

Re: Israeli ministers announce plans for illegal settlements in Gaza and West Bank

#12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't fully agree with this as I've found that The Guardian highlights the plights of the Palestinian more than any other English newspapers. But yeah, in general, most English newspapers have been Israeli apologists (with the BBC being the absolute worst during this genocide), towing their government's line that many Palestinian organisation (like Hamas) and freedom fighters as terrorists. (It's ironic that Americ…

Targeting civilians for hostage taking and otherwise is terrorism. Hamas is a terrorist organisation. Sure, they are freedom fighters, but they are terrorists.

How many civilians were taken hostage and how many civilians were killed in retaliation? That ratio may offer clues to shifting global sentiments.

Re: Israeli ministers announce plans for illegal settlements in Gaza and West Bank

#13
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't fully agree with this as I've found that The Guardian highlights the plights of the Palestinian more than any other English newspapers. But yeah, in general, most English newspapers have been Israeli apologists (with the BBC being the absolute worst during this genocide), towing their government's line that many Palestinian organisation (like Hamas) and freedom fighters as terrorists. (It's ironic that Americ…

Targeting civilians for hostage taking and otherwise is terrorism. Hamas is a terrorist organisation. Sure, they are freedom fighters, but they are terrorists.

One man's "freedom fighter" is indeed another man's "terrorist". My point was that by accepting Israel's position that the Palestinian freedom fighters are "terrorists" western media shows their bias. (Note that only a few countries in the west actually consider PLO or now Hamas a terrorist organisation - the majority of the world doesn't). For someone who has chosen violet politics to fight for his freedom, what makes one a "good" freedom fighter or a "bad" freedom fighter? Isn't taking Israelis hostage better than killing them? When Israel is a military state (as it requires nearly every citizen to compulsorily serve in the military) are Palestinians who use violence, actually using it against civilians or soldiers? (In such a scenario, the only true "civilians" are the children).
Post reply on HN